i don't think Eve was framed. Even though the bible was wrote by men, it was inspired by God. And most of the writers confessed of their faults, take King David for instants. He admitted to all his sinful ways. That is a hard thing to do, write all your faults down for others to read.
2007-03-19 18:59:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by GraycieLee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
An emphatic Yes! Eve was framed, not only because men wrote the bible (with a rather heterosexist blueprint I may add) but because a choice between good and evil was neccesary to the development and progression of man (and woman) kind. Like so many other things, by definition, one cannot logically exist without the other. A balance of opposites is neccesary for the material and spiritual advancement of the human race. Interestingly enough, this process was intiated by a man or god who yet isn't a man. I refer to of course, the being known by many as Lucifer (literally, the Shining One, the Son of the Dawn, the Light-Bearer - you get the idea). Lucifer played the part of teacher and co-hort to an eager but not entirely naive Eve. Knowledge is Power and not a sin. Eve made the right choice. She should be praised, not derided or condemned. The Hebrews called her "Mother of All Living".
2007-03-20 02:23:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Silverleaf 1
·
3⤊
1⤋
Dear Gregdean,
Actually if you read the story of Adam and Eve in Genesis. Although Eve was the one who ate the forbidden fruit, when the two hid from God- God asked Adam.
Adam was in a sense more responsible for what happened because his job was to protect Eve. Although Eve bit into the fruit- Adam failed to do his job as a man in protecting her. And God punished both of them, and when he asked for responsibility- he asked Adam and not Eve. Adam tried to blame Eve.
Anyhow though, upon close reading you'll find that the theory that Eve was framed is faulty- because in the Bible- God actually blames Adam for not protecting Eve.
Hope that helps. Kindly,
Nickster
2007-03-20 02:50:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nickster 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
During that era, men are mostly the MCP (Male chauvinist pig) type. So I guess most of it will condemn women eternally.
And it stated the original sin was from Eve when she eaten from the tree of knowledge.
What I see here is Eve is brave enough, due to her curiosity she ventured out and eat the fruit form the tree just so to see what will happen but than too late because curiosity kills the cat. And bring Adam along...poor Adam!
2007-03-20 01:54:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Trick question, since Adam and Eve didn't exist.
But in the context of the Bible, the Genesis story reeks of sexism. C'mon, why would an omnipotent God uses Adam's rib to create women when he could simply fashion her out of nothing? So now Eve's stuck being obedient to men by "nature?" How convenient. And placing all of the blame for sin and death on women's "disobedience" of a male god and "manipulation" of poor Adam?
Eve was ridiculously punished for something as important as seeking knowledge. What kind of god forces labor pain onto females because someone wanted to learn? Why would God punish Eve's reproductive system, but not that of Adam? Viewed through today's lenses, the story reeks of hatred for women and their independence from men.
It's clear that the misogynist authors were codifying their ancient views on women. I hope we've moved past that sort of crap.
2007-03-20 02:00:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dalarus 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Even better is the Eve of John Milton's _Paradise Lost_. He has Adam and Eve arguing after the Fall. Adam says something along the lines of "If you'd just done what I TOLD you and stayed at home, none of this would have happened." And Eve lashes back, "Hey, you're the brains, I'm just a RIB--you should have MADE me stay at home!" (My paraphrase, of course.)
Ol' Milty wasn't overburdened with admiration for the fairer sex.
2007-03-20 02:47:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's allegorical. It's also sexist, yes. Lots of things in the Bible are. My favorite part of the story is how Eve was "punished" with the pain of childbirth. I mean, really... why not punish her by taking away her capacity to bear life entirely and give it to men who are obviously the more morally responsible gender anyway. :D
2007-03-20 02:00:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jazzycat 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
No Eve was not framed. And her original name is Isha. Adam called her Eve after the fall.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-03-20 01:53:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
EVE WAS DECIEVED
She was told not to touch the tree in the middle of the garden. She did, so all
is LOST from Eden to SAVED in Rev.20:1-6,12,13; The 1000 year reign.
If I had place 39 bible books, as they are, is fine, but in order is below.
#01. Genesis ~~~ Billions in time. Old earth prepared ages in time.
~~~ Gen.1:26; Adam 2368, to Joseph dies, flood-712, 1698 BC
#02. Job [ 2293 to 2433, Moses age 80, Adam-2513 ], flood-857 & 1553 BC.
#03. Exodus 7:7; 12:40,41; Gal.3:16-18 [ 430 covenant to law ] flood-857.
#04. Leviticus
~~~~[ Abraham, Isaac, Jacob & Levi. Priest line 1Cor.6:1-15 & Ezra ];
#05. Numbers [ 33:38,39; Aaron Priest line age 123, 40th year dies ];
#06. Deuteronomy [ Moses 120, 40th died, flood-897, Adam-2553 ]; 1513 BC
#07. Joshua [ 5:6,10,12; 14th day New Year, flood-898th ago ]; 1512 BC
#08. Judges [ 11:26; 300 Judge Jair dies, flood-1198 ]; 1212 BC
#09. Ruth [ Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Parez king line 4:18-22 ]; David 1107 BC
#10. 1Samuel [ Acts 13:20; 450 & 857, flood-1307 , Samuel 80 ]; 1103 BC
#11. 2Samuel [ Saul 1117 to 1077 BC ], David 1077 to 1037 BC
#12. 1Kings [ 6:1; 480 - 1513 Deut.34:7; 36 1Ki.42:11 ] ; 997 BC
#13. Psalms
#14. Proverbs
#15. Ecclesiastes
#16. Song of Solomon 997 BC Judah kings to 391st year
#17. 2 Kings 18 Judah kings- THE PROMISED LAND PROPHETS
#18. 1Chronicles~~~~~~~~ 1077- 1037 BC Nathan and Gad
#19. 2Chronicles~~~~~~~~ 1037- 0947 BC Shemaiah and Jehu
#20. Isaiah~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1027- 0937 BC Old Prophet & Man of God
#21. Hosea ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1017- 0927 BC Micaiah
#22. Joel ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1000- 0950 BC Elijah and Amitai
#23. Amos ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0950- 0827 BC Hosea and Elisha
#24. Obadiah ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0827- 0714 BC Isaiah
#25. Nahum ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0810- 0710 BC Zephaniah and Jonah
#26. Habakkuk ~~~~~~~~~~ 0780- 0750 BC Amos and Micah
#27. Zephaniah ~~~~~~~~~ 0750- 0720 BC Nahum and Obadiah
#28. Micah ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0720- 0650 BC Joel and Habakkuk
#29. Jeremiah~~~~~~0650- 0606- 0570 BC Jeremiah and Baruch
#30. Lamentations ~~0640- 0606- 0654 BC Ezekiel and Huldah
#31. Ezekiel ~~~~~~~~ 0633- 0606-Adam 3460- 0533 BC Daniel and Iddo
#32. Daniel-633-606-533 ~~ 0526- 0443 BC Ezra, Haggai and Mordecai
~~~ Flood 1804 -606 2Ki.25:8; 2Chr.36:20-23; 391st -997 Solomon. 606 BC
#34. Ezra ~ 0526 - 0443 BC Nehemiah, Zechariah and Malachi
#35. Nehemiah.
#36. Esther. #37. Zechariah, 38. Haggai. 39. Malachi. 443 BC
[ 3460, Babylon Empire #3, 606 BC Jesus in Rome #6, 2007 CE ] 6,073
O.T. 39 books 1110 years, done 443 BC. Greece Empire #5, 336 BC
N.T. 27 books 50 - 100 years after Chris in Roman Empire #6.
KJV Bible 1611 published, at 303 years is 1914 after Christ [ now 2007 ],
93 years ago an excepted translation by law of man and God.
2007-03-20 01:57:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by jeni 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
A resounding yes!! Adam took a bite of that apple too!!
2007-03-20 01:53:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋