We tied some fishing line around his molar, and one end to the front door, and I slammed it.
I ended up ripping off his lower jaw, plus most of his bottom lip and right cheek.
Does he have a right to be mad at me?
2007-03-19 15:56:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No way.Its the thought that counts.he should be grateful for your concern.now as for me. i am angry as hell.
You will now have to find him an ugly girlfriend
I hope you feel good about yourself?
2007-03-19 16:03:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Lawsuits are inevitable in today's litigious and greedy society and in this country, he has the right to sue the door manufacturer and the fishing line manufacturer for neglegence, severe hardship, loss of wages, or study time, or personal hygenic habits disrupted, medical bills and destruction of private property, mainly his jaw, lower lip and cheek.
A lawsuit is an injury to someone's person, reputation, or feelings or damage to real property. Under the U.S. system of tort liability, courts can hold injurers liable for many different types of Lawsuits, such as those caused by automobile accidents, contract fraud, trespass, medical malpractice, and defective products, doors and fishing line. The major categories of tort litigation are automobile-related lawsuits (53 percent), premises liability (16 percent), and medical malpractice lawsuits (15 percent).
The plaintiff in a lawsuit suit - your brother in this case - can seek compensation of two types: compensatory damages to cover the "economic" cost of his injuries--for example, medical costs and lost wages--and the "non economic" costs of pain and suffering and punitive damages intended to punish a defendant for willful and wanton conduct.
U.S. tort law is almost exclusively contained in state law, and the large majority of tort cases are filed in state courts. In 2000, more than 700,000 lawsuits were filed in state general courts, compared with only 37,000 in federal courts. Tort law is based primarily on common law--in which judicial rules are developed on a case-by-case basis by trial judges--rather than on legislation.
I am not a lawyer nor do I offer litigation advise, but here are some key words you might need to know when you go shopping for the best lawyer to get the money you so richly deserve:
Collateral-source payments: Amounts that a plaintiff recovers from sources other than the defendant, such as the plaintiff's own insurance. Under the collateral-source rule, that compensation from other sources may not be admitted as evidence at trial.
Contingent fee: A fee charged by an attorney for his or her services only if the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Usually, the contingent fee is calculated as a percentage of the amount the plaintiff recovers from the defendant.
Economic damages: Funds to compensate a plaintiff for the monetary costs of an injury, such as medical bills or loss of income.
Joint-and-several liability: Liability in which each liable party is individually responsible for the entire obligation. Under joint-and-several liability, a plaintiff may choose to seek full damages from all, some, or any one of the parties alleged to have committed the injury. In most cases, a defendant who pays damages may seek reimbursement from nonpaying parties.
Malpractice: "An instance of negligence or incompetence on the part of a professional."(1)
Negligence: A violation of a duty to meet an applicable standard of care.
Non economic damages: Damages payable for items other than monetary losses, such as pain and suffering. The term technically includes punitive damages, but those are typically discussed separately.
Punitive damages: Damages awarded in addition to compensatory (economic and non economic) damages to punish a defendant for willful and wanton conduct.
Statute of limitations: A statute specifying the period of time after the occurrence of an injury--or, in some cases, after the discovery of the injury or of its cause--during which any suit must be filed.
2007-03-19 23:07:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just tell him to disguise as a nun and burn down a church and then he will be happy becuase you converted him to the path of rightness el changoism!
2007-03-19 23:02:59 · answer #3 · answered by ♫That'll be the Day♫ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not if he agreed to this scheme, in which case assumption of the risk is your defense.
2007-03-19 23:05:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
that's an impossible scenario if anything you would have pulled the tooth and couldn't stop the bleeding and needed stitches
2007-03-19 22:59:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
lol, umm.... yea!
thats funny cause i heard of that as a good way to remove a loose tooth, seams kinda barbaric to me, i say let nature take its course.
2007-03-19 22:59:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
that's quite an imagination you have there.....if it were possible to do this then YESSSS....I sure wouldn't go to sleep with him in the house lol
2007-03-19 23:06:03 · answer #7 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, he has a right to be mad at what you did.
2007-03-19 23:00:51 · answer #8 · answered by Jo 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Would you be mad if he did that to you?
2007-03-19 23:05:14 · answer #9 · answered by rbarc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are in the wrong section for your nonsense. PEACE!!!
2007-03-19 23:00:14 · answer #10 · answered by David H 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋