English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush lied to the American people stating we had to invade Iraq because Sadam was hiding weapons of mass destruction yet none were found, not a single empty can was found and his lies have got thousands of American soldiers killed and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians killed so why then were the die hard Bush supporters so mad at my earlier post?

Can't handle the truth? Maybe forgot that Bush is a lier ort just cjose to ignore his criminal acts that killed more Americans then Bim Laden and Sadam ever could have?

2007-03-19 15:54:10 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

September 11 wasn't Bushs fault but all the death after that were. Iraq nor Sadam caused September 11,2001 either yet we invaded Iraq and had Sadam hung...not Bin Laden who was the person behing September 11

2007-03-19 16:01:56 · update #1

No weapons were found, none not even an empty container so what are you talking about. My brother is there right now, he has first hand experience and he is on the chemical weapons terror response team who...if there was any such weapons would have found them

2007-03-19 16:04:54 · update #2

Actually Neno Sadam did everything the U.N. told him to do.....before the first war he refused to follow the U.N.s orders..which by the way Saudi Arabia has done repetedly yet they weren't attacked...and yes they did invade a country that had nothing to do with 911 for one reason...they lied and said there was WMD's by the thousands.. Were any found? No.. how many people have been killed because of this lie... .30,000 civilians and over 3000 American soldiers...period..

2007-03-20 01:17:01 · update #3

The guy about the mustard gas...you are fulll of gas pal.. My brother is there right now, his job is to analyze any weapons or chemicals found and so far they have found nothing.. A find like mustard gas would have made the world news it didn't, my brother would know about it he doesn't so it didn't happen... Another looser supporting Bush with lies just like Bush would have done/

2007-03-21 10:51:25 · update #4

16 answers

That's right, they can't handle the truth.

2007-03-19 15:58:43 · answer #1 · answered by Mario Savio 6 · 2 4

Are you kidding? weapons of mass destruction are being utilized in Iraq on a daily basis. Saddam used them each and every of the time. you're considered one of those folk who merely desire in charge Bush for each thing. have you ever been to Iraq and do you be attentive to all this popular hand or are you getting all your counsel from the liberal media which slant each and every tale to make Bush look undesirable? And on your counsel i do no longer think of Clinton ought to have been impeached the two. It replace into the comparable factor then that it rather is now in elementary terms in opposite: grimy politics. the two events are the two to blame.

2016-10-19 03:22:35 · answer #2 · answered by pereyra 4 · 0 0

For those of you who choose to believe in only your narrow views I will try to expand your knowledge. ( though it will be hard to get someone with a closed mind to actually understand)

First, I'm really sorry that you may believe Iraq is over a singular issue, it is not. Ever since 1991 Saddam Hussein has thumbed his nose at the international community violating U.N. resolution after resolution. Violation of those resolutions had consequences, one of which was military force. Ever since 1991 Saddam Hussein had agreed to a cease fire with coalition forces after being expelled from Kuwait (following his illegal invasion of that country) and over the next twelve years constantly and belligerently violated the terms of that cease fire. Military force was on of the consequences of violating those terms. Ever since Saddam Hussein came to power in 1979 he has systematically killed Iraqi Kurds and Arab Shia' he has willing use chemical and biological weapons on innocent civilians of different ethnic or religious backgrounds. He had the largest genocide 'machine' in place since Nazi Germany.

Second, all of the intelligence that the current administration acted on, with near unanimous concurrence from congress was known as early as 1996. Representatives from the previous administration from President Clinton and Secretary of State Albright to members of congress, both Republican and Democrat,including the current Speaker of the House, Pelosi, warned of how dangerous he was to the world (do a little research it's all on the record). They were not lied to, the American people were not lied to.

Third, let's remember the the United States was hardly alone in this endeavor. There were at least forty-two other countries the supplied troops or logistical support, Australia, Great Britain, Italy, Spain, Poland, Bulgaria to name a few.

Fourth, unfortunately, as in any military operation in or near a populated area civilians are killed. Our troops go out of their way to aviod these casualties.

2007-03-19 17:16:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

What's your question?

We all know already that the Bushco clique lied to get our government involved in invading Iraq. We already know that there is no conceivable benefit to America in continuing this futile campaign. We already know that the war is lost. We already know that our security rests on defending our own country at home such as with the Second Amendment. We already know that the the deluded fundie regime in the White House can now only destroy our Republic. Tell us something we didn't already know. Ask a real question.

2007-03-19 16:23:53 · answer #4 · answered by fra59e 4 · 1 4

No, folks like you can't handle the truth.

Any American soldier that is killed, their blood is on the terrorists hands. American blood has been on their hands for many years, not just 9/11. To say our President killed more Americans than evil bin laden and evil saddam, you obviously don't know your history.

Go dry behind your ears, sounds like you're a little wet behind the ears or just plain ignorant.

2007-03-19 16:01:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

You only concern with how many US soldiers dies, what about Iraqis civilian life?

2007-03-19 18:09:25 · answer #6 · answered by 911 2 · 2 0

I really don't understand why so many people blame President Bush for the war. All he wanted to do is to protect the United States from terrorists. It is not his fault that 911 happened. Give him a break. He is doing the best that he can under the circumstances.

2007-03-19 15:59:38 · answer #7 · answered by mandm 5 · 7 4

Prove he knowingly lied to get us into Iraq War or your name will be added to the long list of koolaid drinking moronic liberals who don't have a f'in clue.

2007-03-19 16:30:44 · answer #8 · answered by TNT 1 · 2 2

You need to do some research honey. Wmd's were found! They were also transported by russian vehicles to syria before the U.S. invasion. So your so called "lies from Bush" are incorrect. This is another example of ignorance that is dividing our country.

2007-03-19 16:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 4 3

My unit recovered two live artillery shells that contained mustard gas.

Maybe it is you who cannot handle the truth?

2007-03-19 16:10:35 · answer #10 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers