Saddam's former deputy hanged in Iraq ? Then why not hang Bush and our vice president?

Question

Hey they hung Sadam saying he commited war crimes against innocent civilians so why not hang Bush? Our troops have killed over 30,000 people in Iraq in less then five years so who is the war criminal? Sounds like good old boy Bush should ne hung too if you apply the same reasoning to this crime he has commited and still is commiting doesn't it?

Bush did comit a crime..he lied to the American people by stating he had proof of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq..that was the entire reason for invading Iraq after September 11, 2001 so maybe you should read a book you friggin low life Bush supporters.. Sadam did nothing to the U.S. period end of story so why did the U.S. invade Iraq when it was Bin Laden, not Sadam who attacked the U.S. Maybe you need to learn how to read.

Furthermore Bush's lies have killed thousands of American soldiers, something neither Sadam or Bin Laden could have done without Bushs ignorance and his invasion of a country that we were not at war with....

People who answer these question claim to be so smart then why didn't you read the United Nations declaration which was posted on Yahoo's main page for two days that stated since the U.S. invaded Iraq no weapons of mass destructiuon have been found and well over 30,000 civilians have been killed in less then 5 years. If we didn't invade a country that was following the U.N. orders then it would not have happened and as for liberal...no way in hell. I don't belive in anything this country stands for as long as the government can lie to us and get our soldiers killed based on that lie and idiots like you support these lies even after the U.N. a United States sponsored terror groups itself condemmed the U.S. for it's actions in Iraq...

Answer 1

They just might at the end of the war crimes trial in 2009.

Answer 2

finding at a number of the previous solutions jogs my memory that people who shout loudest have the least to declare and the main to disguise. The Iraqis that Saddam killed have been in many circumstances killed with the conivance and appoval of england and usa, no longer that Britain has had an self reliant voice for years, and we killed many with the sanctions we imposed on Iraq, which the politicians knew and advantageous was hoping may be the case, so they might portray what were their murderous tyrant as now an self reliant murderous tyrant. try finding in the back of the headlines, a number of you.

Answer 3

Saddam and his VP were hung because they killed almost an entire minority group by using biological warfare and his secret service. Everyone blames bush for getting us into the war and that he lied. He made a recommendation and congress voted to enter Iraq based on the current intelligence that was available at the time.

Answer 4

Golly...mister angry guy. Exactly what is your proof that US service members have killed 30,000 people in Iraq? I'm waiting....

That's what I thought. You are blaming the military for all the Iraqi civilians that have been killed by insurgents and other Iraqi's in sectarian violence. You are one of those "people" who actually believe everything they read on the Internet.

Saddam (spell it correctly) and his deputy were convicted in an Iraqi court and executed under Iraqi law.You seem to have a problem with this. Why?

And yes...I served in as an army officer. And yes, I spent 18 months in Iraq working with the troops on a daily basis. And guess what? I never saw any of them kill an innocent civilian. Gee, what are the odds of that happening?

Answer 5

Go easy there. I'm no fan of President Bush and even less a fan of Vice President Cheney, but that kind of talk is way over the line.
Not funny in the least to any Patriot regardless of party affiliation. It's also illegal unless things have changed.

I'm thinking a quick click on the delete button is probably in order and then a prayer to whatever higher being you believe in that the Secret Service won't come a knockin' would be a prudent follow up.

Answer 6

You said: "Bush did comit a crime..he lied to the American people by stating he had proof of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq..that was the entire reason for invading Iraq after September 11, 2001 so maybe you should read a book you friggin low life Bush supporters.. "

Answer: He has not been proven to have lied, and even leading democrats have admitted that. We live in the U.S.A., where people are innocent until proven guilty. You don't believe in that, it is clear.
That Saddam HAD weapons of mass destruction was a proven fact. The U.N. was sent in to see them destroyed. Saddam lied to them, bragged to his allies that he was fooling the U.N. and still had lots of WMDs.

You blame Bush because he believed Saddam? Because he believed the U.N. when the U.N. said that Saddam was playing games and hiding the WMDs?
You don't have to be a Bush supporter to see that President Bush didn't lie (though Saddam may not have had them by the time President Bush finally got tired of Saddam's games and the U.N.s hollow threats to Saddam for a decade of cease-fire (we never declared peace). You just have to be sane and have read the newspapers for more than the last few years.

Amazing that the war has been boiled down to one reason by the teenagers (or teenagers in mind) of our country. NO political decision is EVER for just one reason. You might consider the following:
1) Saddam tried to ASSASSINATE one of our Presidents. Sorry you don't feel that is a good reason to go to war.
2) Saddam consistantly broke the agreement for the cease-fire after the first Gulf War. That was also reason enough to end the cease fire and finally take Saddam out.
3) Saddam threatened several nations in the region. The reason for the first Gulf War was that he attacked Kuwait. He supplied families that supplied suicide bombers who killed Israeli citizens with money-awards for success.

That doesn't count either, does it?

How about oil? Interesting how the socialists in our country (and the politically suicidal) have made "oil" a bad word.
WHEN did protecting our interests around the globe become a BAD thing? What country do you live in, and if you live in our country, what country do you plan to invade us and replace us?

To heck with you! What possible good are you to any body in this country if you would betray us this way?

You said: Sadam did nothing to the U.S. period end of story so why did the U.S. invade Iraq when it was Bin Laden, not Sadam who attacked the U.S. Maybe you need to learn how to read.

Answer: read the section above, though reading a few newspaper articles older than you are might be more educational.

"...end of story..."

Real classy. Go educate yourself on this issue. You aren't doing your side of the argument any good.

That you don't know the difference between our Presidents' action (including President Clinton that bombed multiple sites, killing multiple civilians) is staggeringly apparent. Your loyalties and conception of the difference between our enemies and ourselves is also very clear.

You have sided with our enemies, your behavior is seditious, and your behavior is noted.

Sedition is no longer a crime (it should be in times of war), but we have free speech as well.

We see you. We'll answer you.

Every time.

Answer 7

Reading some of these responses makes me convinced that the liberals are a danger to all our freedoms.

They seem to want 'crime' to be defined by their political opinions.

What's next - 're-education camps' for people who disagree with your politics?

Answer 8

For those of you who choose to believe in only your narrow views I will try to expand your knowledge. ( though it will be hard to get someone with a closed mind to actually understand)

First, I'm really sorry that you may believe Iraq is over a singular issue, it is not. Ever since 1991 Saddam Hussein has thumbed his nose at the international community violating U.N. resolution after resolution. Violation of those resolutions had consequences, one of which was military force. Ever since 1991 Saddam Hussein had agreed to a cease fire with coalition forces after being expelled from Kuwait (following his illegal invasion of that country) and over the next twelve years constantly and belligerently violated the terms of that cease fire. Military force was on of the consequences of violating those terms. Ever since Saddam Hussein came to power in 1979 he has systematically killed Iraqi Kurds and Arab Shia' he has willing use chemical and biological weapons on innocent civilians of different ethnic or religious backgrounds. He had the largest genocide 'machine' in place since Nazi Germany.

Second, all of the intelligence that the current administration acted on, with near unanimous concurrence from congress was known as early as 1996. Representatives from the previous administration from President Clinton and Secretary of State Albright to members of congress, both Republican and Democrat,including the current Speaker of the House, Pelosi, warned of how dangerous he was to the world (do a little research it's all on the record). They were not lied to, the American people were not lied to.

Third, let's remember the the United States was hardly alone in this endeavor. There were at least forty-two other countries the supplied troops or logistical support, Australia, Great Britain, Italy, Spain, Poland, Bulgaria to name a few.

Fourth, unfortunately, as in any military operation in or near a populated area civilians are killed. Our troops go out of their way to avoid these casualties.

Answer 9

I ABSOLUTELY agree with your question. most people will disagree and most of them will deny the very fact, but bush is just as guilty as anyone in terms of war crimes.

the iraq war is illegal as a war can be since the war was based on 2 main facts

1. saddam and iraqi ties to 9/11 = total false
2. iraq and wmds = total false

so what has bush done to shoulder responsibility? nothing

so many innocent people have died in iraq due to his ignorance plus our troops and all the people who have been hurt and maimed for life.

the only reason bush is not arrested and put on trial is because he happens to be the leader of America.

and i am VERY ashamed of that fact.

Answer 10

WOW you're sharp. Not. You know how many Germans dies when we invaded? Innocent German people? So we should have left Hitler alone, according to your "logic."

Read up on Dresden, brain surgeon.