English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-19 14:46:23 · 12 answers · asked by lip11 3 in Politics & Government Military

I don't just mean the brave contractors who are working on the ground in very dangerous areas like Iraq. I'm also talking about the military-industrial complex, like Lockheed-Martin, Halliburton, etc...

2007-03-19 14:58:41 · update #1

Part of the point I'm trying to make is that the republican talking point "support the troops" which is so religiously accepted by patriotic americans, really means "support the huge profits that their military companies" make by being at war.

2007-03-19 15:00:48 · update #2

12 answers

Military contractors are the highest paid people in the war zone. Individuals can make in a few months something like 40-50 thousand dollars. The money is good, if you live long enough to collect it.

2007-03-20 05:25:42 · answer #1 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

Contractor do get paid a lot more. However only a small percent are armed. I am in the military and I don't have any problem with the contractors making as much as they do because they have no way to fight back if someone is shooting at them.

2007-03-20 01:39:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Contractors. They get paid way more. Here is an excerpt from an article on CNN.com:
"It pays quite well. There's a lot of contracts that pay anywhere from $350 a day to $1,500 a day," said Chris Boyd of Kroll-Crucible Security.

Military analysts say the private security arrangement allows regular military troops to concentrate on fighting. But they are concerned that the lucrative pay offered by private contractors -- often more than $100,000 a year -- is depleting the ranks of the special forces.

2007-03-19 14:53:16 · answer #3 · answered by EB 2 · 2 0

contractors by a long shot. I havent seen a contractor get payed less than 6 digits for a 9 month deployment.

It takes being a general to make that much.

2007-03-19 14:55:44 · answer #4 · answered by t2kmf 3 · 0 0

Contractors.

2007-03-19 14:51:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Contractors are paid 2 to 3 times more then the average soldier. they are also better equipped and in some cases better trained.

2007-03-19 15:14:02 · answer #6 · answered by Paul C 3 · 0 0

With all due respect...... you sound like one indignant little witch. earlier you get your hackles up hearken to me. he's out so pay has come to an finished quit. final the account or no longer putting it up suited on seperation guarantees that. the vast severance pay? It does no longer artwork that way. you may be a prevalent and it does no longer artwork that way. there is not any huge payout. it will be worked out in some unspecified time sooner or later yet when you worry you want to plot on no longer getting any money any time quickly as he has left. the priority to do is to easily bypass to a submit or call up the chain more beneficial. you're shocked with what may be finished.

2016-12-02 06:26:47 · answer #7 · answered by woomer 4 · 0 0

i would think if the military paid more the contractors would join the military since the money is their motivation. it aint all patriotism.

2007-03-19 20:00:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Contractors, of course.

2007-03-19 14:55:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

corporate contractors.

2007-03-19 20:11:42 · answer #10 · answered by nay 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers