Many people say that after failing to find stockpiles of WMD, Bush "switched" rationale for the war. Consider this
excerpt from a New York Times editorial about a speech Bush gave weeks before the coalition entered Iraq:
"President Bush sketched an expansive vision last night of what he expects to accomplish by a war in Iraq. Instead
of focusing on eliminating weapons of mass destruction, or reducing the threat of terror to the United States, Mr.
Bush talked about establishing a 'free and peaceful Iraq' that would serve as a 'dramatic and inspiring example' to
the entire Arab and Muslim world, provide a stabilizing influence in the Middle East and even help end the
Arab-Israeli conflict."
Still confused? Please write back, and I'll try again.
2007-03-19 13:18:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by SnowWebster2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The short answer is because our government wanted them to be.
The long answer is that we fought back against the terrorism that led to the attacks on September 11, 2001. Those attackers trained in Afghanistan. After toppling the Taliban, we, America, decided that Iraq posed a threat to the world and it would be best to topple the government of Saddam Hussein.
The reason that we are STILL there is because after taking the government down we unleashed a cultural war that was completely, or at least seemed to be, unexpected. We are going to be there until Iraq's new government can take on some of the security roles itself.
2007-03-19 13:01:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
B/c Iraq has no security. Like we have the police, FBI whatever to protect us. They dont so when a group of radicalist, who live in that country start to bomb everyone usually for money and ruleling reasons they have no one to stop them like the Nazis, an uncontrolable group. You stick up to them and they say eff you and shoot you in the head. In America you would go to jail. There it would be nothing.
So if you get a group of people and theres no strong leader this, whats happenig can happen and is
But thats not Americas responibility. China should take care of it, or Russia. There closer. But America has a big ego and always has to be the hero
2007-03-19 13:02:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq violated the 1991 cease fire treaty by having missles that went beyond a certain range. An agreement to destroy the missles was a dragging process, all while weapons inspectors were turned away. Violation of the cease fire & the closed door policy to weapons inspectors led to the deployment of US soldiers backed by the US congress and the Executive branch of the United States.
2007-03-19 13:06:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by MFANIC 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Many reasons....Iraq was harboring and supporting terrorists, Saddam was a bad man, they need to be supported in their fight for democracy.....
NOTHING TO DO WITH OIL..........In 30 years we gaot less than 2% of our oil from Iraq....Just prove that the Libs don't know a thing....they keep saying it is about the oil.....IT ISN'T
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr Dummies all
2007-03-19 13:12:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
American troops are in Iraq because their commander-in-chief sent them there.
2007-03-19 13:00:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Max 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
god no matter how many times someone asks this they just keep on asking....to establish a functional government, with a strong military strong enough to stand alone with out American assistance.
2007-03-19 13:03:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
have you seen the gas prices? iraq supplies our gas, and bush is putting soldiers in there. put two and two together. bush also suspects that iraq has weapons of mass destruction and is going against the wishes of the united nations.
2007-03-19 12:59:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dynamite 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
because the president felt that the terror cells that attacked us were being aided by them. And to stop terror you have to go for the root cause.
2007-03-19 12:59:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by sputmonkey 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
To justify the enormous expense of maintaining the world's most advanced military.
2007-03-19 13:00:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by $Sun King$ 7
·
0⤊
2⤋