I ain't got nothin' to hide,so I ain't worried about it !!!
2007-03-19 10:56:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by knot_your_daddy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, I wouldn't. They want to track you because they think YOU are terrorists and nothing more than that.
Look at the facts:
Habius Corpus has been suspended.
We no longer have any rights based on the whim of the "President." and the "patriot" act.
Illegal aliens have more rights than legal citizens. Who else do you think if they did a federal crime would be freed just because they had children? Those kids from the raids should have either went WITH their parents or into foster care.
2007-03-19 11:02:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by hera 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep....heard of these.....they are trying first with it in some form of ID but they have it in Europe and they've already had it go bust. It's just the pre-lim before they plan on putting it in us. Wouldn't surprise me a bit if they haven't already started doing it secretly.
What do Christians think? LOL I don't think it sets well at all......but then again the way this world is going.....it's no big deal to implant a Christian....just don't make a Muslim scan bacon.
2007-03-19 10:52:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
First off, Real ID is great. I think ID should be standardized, it is easier for me to get new license when I moved to Virginia than it was to renew my license in New Jersey. That shouldn't be the case. As far as RFID's if they are being pushed so silently how do you know about them, but everyone in congress doesn't?
If Jessica Lunsford had an RFID would she be dead right now? Or would authorities have found her as soon as her father said she was missing. That father who died in Oregon in the blizzard would he be dead if he had an RFID and rescuers could've found him? What about escaped convicts, and other kidnapped victims? When RFIDs save lives is that such a horrible thing?
2007-03-19 10:53:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
My dogs has one. they can't song you everywhere. they might in elementary terms transmit an exceedingly susceptible sign for some ft. they are no longer being utilized in people yet. some people think of they might want for use to supply identity and scientific counsel rather of scientific archives. bracelets. there's a provision in the " well-being care" ( scientific well-being insurance ) invoice that calls for insurance companies to pay for them. they are no longer in the flu vaccine. Takes a lots greater suitable needle to inject them. some States are embedding them in drivers licenses. California is one. Libraries placed them in books. some paintings works have them so as that in the event that they're stolen they might greater rather be differentiated from forgeries. they're embedded as I suggested in some products and packaging. Like cameras.
2016-10-19 02:43:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
First standardized ID's are a great thing working in the financial world it would help.
Second NO WAY IN GODS GREEN EARTH!!! would they implant one in me or my children.
Thats that. Great idea but in no uncertain terms the government was formed to serve the people not the people to serve the government..............hmmmmm which is this.
2007-03-19 11:10:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Seth R 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The data is to be put in the cards, not in the people.
I don't like the government tracking us more than it does either, but with illegal immigration, terrorism and subsidized benefits, I don't see any way around it.
2007-03-19 10:48:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by DAR 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's not a good idea no matter how you look at it.
2007-03-19 10:47:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hawtman1092 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's the mark of the beast!
2007-03-19 10:52:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by jeb black 5
·
1⤊
0⤋