English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-19 06:41:25 · 15 answers · asked by Viola R 1 in Sports Martial Arts

15 answers

Much as I hate to admit it, as I am a descendant of Eric the Red, the Spartans would win, because those maniacs ate slept, and LIVED armed combat! Vikings were more surprise-attack raiders than combat soldiers.
300 Spartans could beat 300 SEALS or 300 Recon Marines, with Spartan weapons; SEALS and Recon are our very BEST, but even THEY aren't THAT good!

2007-03-19 07:01:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Vikings weren't used to the kind of warfare the spartans were, which included various complex formations, not to say vikings weren't smart enough to fight this kind of warfare, it's just that they and their opponents didn't use it. Both groups are very hardcore, but I'd give the edge to spartans, as being a soldier was the profession of all men, training since childhood, although if the 300 vikings are bersekers...... that would be something the the spartans have never seen before, I wouldn't know the outcome of that battle, and it would make an awesome movie!

2007-03-19 07:42:40 · answer #2 · answered by Frank the tank 7 · 2 0

One on one the Vikings may prevail. Spartans do not wrestle that way and three hundred berserkers charging into the Spartans may likely lose. The vikings did have a lot more desirable metallic than the bronze spears and swords of the Spartans. they could were able to shrink correct by their protection with the vast Iron swords. in addition they had chain mail and very sturdy padding below. that's plausible that could make a huge distinction.

2016-12-02 05:56:11 · answer #3 · answered by abila 4 · 0 0

Im gonna go with Spartans. I haven't heard of Vikings taking on that many opponents. It would be a great battle though.

2007-03-19 17:21:05 · answer #4 · answered by Reds 2 · 0 0

Vikings, because Minnesota is an NFL team and the Michigan State Spartans are only college.

2007-03-19 07:51:41 · answer #5 · answered by James 1 · 2 1

The Spartans were a professionally trained militarial contingent/militarial society....the Vikings on the other hand were thugs that raped, pillaged, and destroyed every society they came into contact with.

This being the case, through both lifestyle and training, the Spartans would have decimated the Vikings on a land-based conflict.

2007-03-19 08:24:22 · answer #6 · answered by Manji 4 · 0 2

Realistically, it would probably have been the Spartans. Vikings were pretty hard core, but Sprtans were better trained, and better organized. But it woulda been one hell of a battle, because those are definitely two groups of people who were all about glory in death.

2007-03-19 06:52:40 · answer #7 · answered by G_Wheely 2 · 1 1

The 300 Spartans, because they were trained from infancy to be nothing but fighting machines basically, they are the super soldier of their time feard throughout the world.

2007-03-19 06:51:27 · answer #8 · answered by carletoburrito94 1 · 1 1

Spartans!!!

2007-03-19 10:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

Spartans, They were superior to everyone.

2007-03-19 06:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by Disco 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers