2007-03-19 06:12:17 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
right
2007-03-19 06:14:53 · answer #1 · answered by Mike 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what you are referring to. There are many moral situations where it is better to be right than safe. Martin Luther King is an excellent example. He stood up for what was right, even though it was dangerous and eventually cost his life.
2007-03-19 13:17:05 · answer #2 · answered by Jensenfan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither. Its better to be responsible for your actions, and to consider what the other person is considering. What good is being right if it gets you killed, and what good is being safe, if you are a prisoner. I choose reason and responsibility every time.
2007-03-19 13:20:09 · answer #3 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cleverly hidden Pascal's Wager
*drink*
2007-03-19 13:15:56 · answer #4 · answered by KryptonOne 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes and no. or could be, no and yes. Is it safe? I have a right to know.
2007-03-19 13:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
safe
2007-03-19 13:16:15 · answer #6 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Safe. Being right but being dead doesn't make sense to me!
2007-03-19 13:15:07 · answer #7 · answered by kiwi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
With regards to faith it is better to be right, then you automatically are saved. Rightly dividing the word of truth.
Jesus said I am the way and the truth. So, with Jesus, it's all covered.
2007-03-19 13:15:52 · answer #8 · answered by sassinya 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Or,
What is better to mix apples with oranges or to know the price of tea in China? That's what I want to know...
2007-03-19 13:16:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm, I think I smell a Pascal's Wager question in disguise. Who's with me?
2007-03-19 13:15:14 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋