Situation, bro in law got stopped in our home town. He was very argumentative, and rude to the officier that stopped him. The situation escalated to a much higher level,when he got out of the car and agressively went towards the officier. After several mins, and back up he was hand cuffed and taken to jail. The car was searched and was found under the driver's seat. He's a twice covicted felon, agg. assault, and a sex with a minor-felony count. (more details can be said if you want to email me questions)
1st question - How long will he be in prision for the firearm charge? (It's gone to the Feds for prosecution)
2nd question - What are the chances that his felony assault on a peace officier will go along with it and how much time?
3rd question - Can and should his wife be prosecuted for supplying firearms to a known felon? She lied on the forms to acquire the guns while living with/married to the felon.
2007-03-19
05:30:49
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law Enforcement & Police
4th question - How long is she possibly looking at if she is convicted of supplying firearms to him? My understanding is that on the form it asks if you are a convicted felon and if you are married to or live with a convicted felon. Wouldn't that end up being two charges, supplying and falsification of federal documents?
2007-03-19
06:52:22 ·
update #1
(1) At least 5 years (2) This is a state charge , which he will have to face after the feds get finish with him (3) Yes indeed , she can be prosecuted under the "straw man" rule for firearms transactions. This is a Federal offense.
2007-03-19 06:17:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. I think the felon in possession of a firearm is a 5 year minimum sentence, but in some states can be as much as 10 years and a $25000 fine.
2. Felony assault on a police officer is likely here if he punched or kicked the officer. Simply charging the officer is not assault. In washington, assault on a public servant (police, fire, bus driver surprisingly) is considered Assault in the Third degree, and is a class C felony.
3. The wife could be charged with this, but isn't likely. She has a right to purchase a firearm, if she's not also a felon. The court would have to prove that she wasn't purchasing the firearm for herself, which is difficult.
2007-03-19 06:08:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jon L 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd guess on a Federal firearm's charge I believe the minimum is 5 years. The chances of assault on a police officer going as well is excellent but would be a local charge and I'd guess at 10 years on that. Yes, his wife can and should go to jail. Both the lying and the supplying are felonies.
2007-03-19 05:39:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by dude0795 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
He might get life for being a 3 time loser. While his wife might have had the right to purchase the firearm, knowingly supplying it to a convicted felon is a felony as is lying on a federal document. A convicted felon can't even stay or live in a place where he/she knows that they could have access to a firearm.
I suggest you stay far away from these people.
2007-03-19 05:54:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by charlie_the_carpenter 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are some great arguments right here. great question Curious. As a retired Cop it may marvel some that have a tendency to bypass the way of Mountain guy in this subject. there's a project with a guy or woman paying their debt to society, yet residing the remainder of their lives as a 2nd type citizen, because of the fact we forget approximately that they might't vote the two. i will work out the place they might have a loss of loyalty to the community and this could lead on directly to a clean violation. I additionally see some credence with preserving firearms out of the palms of those of convicted violent crimes, which with the help of how we already do with those convicted of kinfolk Violence. besides the fact that if, thinking how basic it rather is for a guy or woman to get set up on a kinfolk Violence rap, I even have some doubts approximately this regulation. i might desire to in keeping with risk see a a million 12 months waiting era, or something comparable. What I concern the main is that the government is determining the thank you to disarm the conventional public one phase at a time. merely look at their effectual marketing campaign to ostracize tobacco clientele. while they ruin the rights of one phase, while will they be after yours. a guy or woman charged with killing somebody whilst drunk using can at last get their license lower back and purchase a clean motor vehicle. isn't there something hypocritical approximately this. i do no longer see any huge adjustments in the close to destiny, yet this makes for healthful debate. i think of our legal device, like all sturdy church, desires a sturdy reformation on celebration. i might strongly propose everybody to supply up turning out to be a member of the government in stripping the rights from different communities, regardless in case you like them or no longer. or you're in elementary terms a gadget of the propaganda.
2016-10-19 02:07:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by balikos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. He should get a least 5 years on the firearms violation.
2. Chances are good since he's already a felon that they will lower the boom on him.
3. Your brother's wife has every right to buy and own any firearm she wishes, he's a felon, not her.
2007-03-19 05:37:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by bigbro3006 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Depending on the state, he could get life since this would be his 3rd strike. If the state doesn't have 3 strikes it could be 10 years. It is up to the prosecution for the assault. As far as his wife, it depends whether she knew he was going to use them. Even if she is charged, she could probably take a plea for no jail time, probably probation.
2007-03-19 05:42:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋