They have no lawyer(s) or choice(s) of a trial to non-plead guilty.
Either confess or spend the rest of your life in jail.
I do not believe their confessions are true.
Do you believe the confessions of these prisoners? Why or Why Not?
2007-03-19 05:25:06 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Should we believe the claims that they were tortured?
In fact - anybody who claims that people were tortured at Gitmo are accusing the troops of war crimes. Do they have any evidence to back up their accusations?
Sounds like these people do not 'support the troops' - instead they support any accusations (no matter how unreasonable) made against those troops.
BTW - my brother served at Gitmo, are you accusing him of torture?
2007-03-19 06:50:14 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How can they confess when they don't know the half of the charges?
If they've been caught red handed why haven't they been formally charged and tried? So much for due process. Oh wait.......
These "detainees" are being held in a circumvention of the law. Gitmo is not considered US soil, so the people there do recieve the rights they would be given if they were actually in the US.
Its nearly as clever as the Rendition process where in "detainees" are taken from countries where torture is prohibited to prisons is countries where torture is allowed.
2007-03-19 14:24:52 · answer #2 · answered by Kate 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The confessions are very suspect, and they seem very convenient for the government.
The men may have been tortured; there is no way to prove their confessions, and all confessions gained from torture must be suspect.
One of the men seemed to be bragging and exaggerating his role. Perhpas he was involved in one or more terrorist acts, even as a leader. However, the general veracity of his statements is questionable.
2007-03-20 18:24:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, they have been detained without warrant or charges, have had no access to legal council, have been isolated and detained in conditions that are less than humane.
The fact that these people are willing to admit to everything down to running over your grandmother's cat should be a testament to why these confession cannot be taken seriously.
2007-03-21 02:19:30 · answer #4 · answered by smedrik 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Trace their educational background.
Will leave footprints on it.
One must have a very deep knowledge in mastering ghostly modern history of failures and horrors of the past to be like those in the past .
Can only communicate in ghostly kitchen's dialect from the graveyards of different ancestor's custom in planet of apes.
Will leave tell tales of ghostly stories in planet of apes.
With self prides as people of different races of self racism with non-existence rights of original descendant in planet of apes..
Should try and follow the footprints left behind when the mess was first created "Out of Africa" in planet of apes.
2007-03-21 05:04:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry above poster but: The United States Government has already convicted military service personnel of such.
And don't forget our government's policy has been to outsource torture as well ...
When Uncle Sam believes he is Above the Geneva Convention, United Nations Human Rights Council, American Civil Liberties Union and Amnesty International, he's gotten Too big for his britches.
Our government representatives whether elected, appointed, contracted or salaried do just that ... represent US. We hold accountability as United States of America citizens. Is it any wonder the world passes judgment on US?
What are you going to do?
2007-03-19 07:45:10 · answer #6 · answered by ... 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There is no valid reason to believe any admissions from the prisoners in Guantanamo.
The admissions reportedly by Khalid Sheik Muhammed highlight the incredulity of admissions by those held captive and likely tortured.
When a person is tortured, in any manner, they can be made to say anything.
2007-03-19 05:30:29 · answer #7 · answered by ken erestu 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No this is going to no longer be adequate. they might desire to be banned for all times. because of the fact of their act finished gamers and their business enterprise have been given Tarnished. As you suggested different hundreds of harmless cricketer whose each and every regular interest from now onwards may be under doubt and suspicion. my coronary heart is going to those cricketers families , they might have sacrificed the main suitable of those youthful days, many greater issues to lead them to cricketers.What an soreness for them. The proud mom and father and the siblings of cricketers life lengthy previous in to smoke with the help of one stoke of mistake. I say the circumstances that led to those scandal must be good investigated. even if it rather is performed in greed shoud be punished with life ban. If there is an iota of innocence then they might desire to be couselled and save them away for few years. supply them some selection because of the fact they knew no different commerce yet palying cricket. think of from thier viewpoint too.
2016-10-19 02:05:51 · answer #8 · answered by balikos 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wheres your proof? Are these Terrorist there for singing to loud in the mosque? As a military police officer im proud say ive put a few of these poor missunderstood folks there. Every single one of them was found red handed and have been responsible for untold numbers of deaths. you weeping liberals disgust me.
2007-03-19 09:53:51 · answer #9 · answered by horgurce 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The prisoners are terrorists.
2007-03-19 10:32:33 · answer #10 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋