2007-03-19 03:45:10 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lol .. im sure they at least knew that much ... and Jesus followers wouldnt have let Him be identified anyway ...and ima absolutely positive that a marked tomb could not have gone unoticed for thousands of years ... Jesus was a popular dude at the time ...
2007-03-19 03:50:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
'They' are idiots. That tomb has been around for 20 years, and only now does some stupid TV producer decide he can make some hay out of it. It belongs to a middle class family from Jerusalem. Jesus (Yeshuah) was from Galilee, which is where His family SHOULD be found. But if the Resurrection is fiction, as a tomb would imply, why bother?
2007-03-19 10:55:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus body was transfigured. He ascended with it. Jehovah God delivered him.
His bones will never be discovered in a tomb. He was never married or had children. His was such a written about life that these facts would have been important. But no one wrote about a wife or child of his. In fact he said it was okay to marry if you were inflamed with passion but it was better to serve God whole-souled and stay single.
The Greek name Jesus corresponds to the Hebrew name Jeshua or in fuller form Jehoshua meaning Salvation of Jah.
Satan will always try to get people all stirred up with different things to draw them away from pure worship. Satan only has a short time left to draw everyone he can away from God. He is going down and wants to destroy you too.
Keep awake, study the bible, associate with God's people, pray for strength in these last days.
2007-03-19 11:10:13 · answer #3 · answered by debbie2243 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because He was known as Jesus. There is no doubt of his existance however there is a doubt he was the son of god (if there is a god), There were around 21 other people declaring to be the son of god at the exact same time in the exact same area.
2007-03-19 10:52:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're not, really. They just use the translation "Jesus" when talking about it to the English speaking population. Kind of like the name Matisyahu translates into "Matthew" in English. You wouldn't look for the name "Matthew" on his grave if it were written in Hebrew....you would look for Matisyahu....then say to your friends in English "Here lies Matthew".
2007-03-19 10:51:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are not looking for "Jesus". They are looking for a version consistent with the time and place, which would be Yshua or similar in aramaic or hebrew. They just use "Jesus" in translation.
2007-03-19 10:48:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
People are constantly trying to discredit the Bible's teachings. This began with Satan the Devil and continues to this day. Anyone who does this should consider themselves followers of Satan.
2007-03-19 10:55:40 · answer #7 · answered by Roxie J Squared 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are not. and the name on the ossuary was "Yeshua Bar Yosef" in Hebrew letters, which means "Jesus Son of Joseph" in Hebrew.
2007-03-19 10:53:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because it's better than finding Phyllis
besides, he went by his stage name most of the time. and, for a few years, he changed his name to Frank.
2007-03-19 10:47:16 · answer #9 · answered by jen1981everett 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
jesus real name wasnt jushua!
2007-03-19 10:49:30 · answer #10 · answered by Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore™ 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋