If white people evolved from black people, why are there still black people?

Question

Evolutionists claim that monkeys evolved into blacks, and then blacks evolved into white people. But if that's true, how are there still black people?! Doesn't this disprove evolution?

Answer 1

if you are serious,
then your making christians look ignorant

Answer 2

1/ Evolutionists do not clam that monkeys evolved into blacks, and then blacks evolved into white people. Evolved from is the correct process.

2/ Blacks and whites and all the other races evoluved to fit the environment they settled in. The race we call white where those who settled in the north europe, they did not need the dark pigments in the skin to protect themselves from the sun so it evolved out. The Black races stayed in hotter climents and needed the pigment so it remained.

It is noticable that northen europian peoples who have settled in hotter reagens like Austrailia are having massive problems with skin cancers.

So in fact far from disproving evolution, once the correct terminology is used and the facts put into the question - it soundly adds to the proof of evolution.

Answer 3

Students! Evolution and its theory only was produced by White Leadership to disprove that Black People were not the first race on the Earth! Because if they were that would put White People in 2nd place, and the White Man is never going to allow that to happen! White people are the product of Albino's, yes that's right! As a result of many Black people migrating to Europe and living in the cold Ice Age, Nature steps in and adjust their genetic makeup to help them survive! Altering their pigmentation and Melon in their skin, the result were Albino's. You can only get the color White from Black! The history of our country is to cover up any credit of Black people, i.e. first people, inventions, even the historical statues in Egypt were defaced, removing their nose, lips, ears, so no one would know they were Black! Who does that? History books say Cleopatra was White, Lol it's a joke, anything that is good was White! It's obvious White People are in Psychopatic denial and because White people write the history books the only thing you/we can learn and know are the lies, secrets, that cause all of us to be dysfunctional. Research for yourself right here on the internet, your most renowned scientist, scholars, tell you the same.

Answer 4

This must be a theory of evolution that I have not seen. I have never seen where black evolved into white. That has no merit, since the black gene pool is dominant. If you look at an interracial couple, the child is often born with dark skin. I do not believe in evolution due to religious beliefs. Yet, I believe that with the brilliant scientific minds that we have in the world today, it would only take a moment to deduce that that theory would not hold merit.

Answer 5

"Evolutionists claim that monkeys evolved into blacks, and then blacks evolved into white people."

Say what??? They say no such thing!

Evolution says that humans and monkeys came from a common ancestor. That is very different from saying that humans evolved from monkeys.

And it's *anthropology* and *genetics* that indicates that the first humans appeared in Africa, and then migrated elsewhere. But that does not mean that ALL humans in Africa migrated to Europe.

Just as Europeans migrated from Europe to the Americas ... that does NOT mean that ALL Europeans migrated to the Americas ... that's why we still have Europeans.

The sheer lack of LOGIC of some Creationists just astounds me!

Answer 6

You should try taking some biology courses and studying biology.

Evolution doesn't occur is a straight line. Different environments can cause evolution to branch out in many paths. This is very evident in the evolution of species segregated on the Galapagos islands.

Answer 7

Actually, if you understood evolution you would realise those near the equator had a better chance of survival if they were black, giving better protection from sunburn, while those in ice bound northern europe had a better chance of survival if they blended in with their surroundings, hence the white skin.

This principle of natural selection has been observed in modern times with a species of moth that was white because it was harder to birds to spot them. The area where they lived became industrialised and polluted. The white moths suddenly stood out and got taken by the birds, while darker mutations survived and prospered. Within a few short years, all the moths were dark.

Natural selection at work and observed as truth.

Answer 8

Actually, there is no way to really say if people were originally dark skinned, but it makes sence given the climate. It is believed that light skin developed in colder climates as a way to help humans who spent most of there time covered in animal furs frezing their butt's off, to absorb more sunlight. Humans need sunlight to produce vitamin D which is used to prevent, the deficiency disease, rickets. Darker skinned people didn't need this adaptation in the regions where they were living, so didn't develop it. Now in days, natural selection doesn't work very well on us humans since we superceded it with our technology, so dark skinned people who live in polar regions, and vice versa, don't have any biological drive to adapt different skin pigmentations.

Answer 9

each and every race began from black africans...it merely took some hundred thousand years to create whites asians, pacific islanders, interior of sight individuals, indians, etc.....we've not developed on the grounds that then the two have been nonetheless homo sapiens with distinctive exterior features

Answer 10

No, Evolution happens in part by isolation and adaptation. If you look at the galopogos islands, there are sever examples of this. They all started off as the same species of bird or insect on their particular island, but their populations were isolated and as they adapted seperately over time they became seperate and very distinguishable species. There are also examples of this in fish in south america and african lakes, this stems from when pangea was disforming. In fact some species of fish in eastern south america are more closely related to some african fish, than they are to their western south american counterparts.

Answer 11

You need to research this a lot more. There is far more to the point of view you are skimming than you seem to know! It has a lot to do with the migration of people, the separation of continents, the availability of food and tools and shelters both natural & hand made. Learn more about it before making thoughtless comments.