the glass is neither completely filled nor completely empty
it can be made empty as well as completely filled with water
therefore
half filled glass=half empty glass
2007-03-20 04:56:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by klark kent 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there's a substance in a tumbler that involves 0.5 of the potential of the glass, then that's 0.5 complete. it is not any longer 0.5 empty. right here is the reason... evaluate that an entire glass has a cost of a million. a tumbler, crammed as much as the mid-element with some form of count has a cost of a million/2. consequently, that tumbler nevertheless has fee. a million/2 x a million = a million/2. That fee is a million/2 and it is not any longer empty in any respect. to declare that a tumbler is empty (no substance interior) is to declare that it has a cost of 0. to declare that a tumbler is 0.5 empty is to declare that that's 0.5 of 0. a million/2 x 0 = 0. consequently, a nil.5 empty glass has no fee. yet all of us understand that 0.5 of the glass has mass. consequently, this assertion is faulty. The glass is 0.5 complete, while thinking the full. the different assertion is faulty.
2016-12-15 03:39:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Half full!
2007-03-19 03:12:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Xiomy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, honestly, whether it is half full or half empty, it does not really matter to me. for me, the water when taken in, may help rehydrate...
2007-03-19 03:10:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by trooper J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Half full, I'm optimistic.
2007-03-19 08:12:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by perfecttenn86 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
half full
2007-03-19 03:16:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
half full
2007-03-19 03:11:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋