8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
2007-03-19 00:05:14 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No... it was roman soldier with a hammer
2007-03-19 00:07:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No! The whole idea of Sin & Salvation is baseless and a great fraud with the mankind.
Did ADAM asked me before the sin??
Every soul shall bear his own A/c.( Good / Bad ).
This fact is written in OT as well as in Quran - The Last and Final verdict of The God of Abraham - The Lord of Universe.
Sorry ! Many would not agree to your point but would say that:
"The Commandments of Christ were nailed to Cross".
This is the reason...why Christians do not bother about OT & Real Commandments of Jesus Christ!
Inspirations of Paul from unknown ghosts is the main source of the Faith!
Sorry! If the fact herts you....
2007-03-19 02:29:31 · answer #2 · answered by aslam09221 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're asking for whoever literally nailed Jesus Christ on the cross, it would, indeed, I guess be the Roman soldier. However,
reading the verse within its context maybe be of help. Because of the sins of mankind, he was "stricken," so in a way to certain extent, the sins of mankind of did nail the Lord Jesus Christ to the cross.
2007-03-19 00:11:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the old testament days of Moses, Noah, David .....once a week around the Sabbath, people were required to sacrifice an animal. Different animals represented different sins. Birds, cattle, goats and sheep were the most likely candidates. They were slain and their blood was symbolic of washing away the sins of the tribe making the sacrifice. It was considered that sacrificing a young lamb was the purest and most fulfilling sacrifice of all.
When Jesus died, the Lamb of God, His sacrifice was a once and for All sacrifice. He died for the sins of those alive at that time who believed in Him AND He died for the sins of all who have believed in Him since.
2007-03-19 00:36:16 · answer #4 · answered by baril25 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
with regard to the eating of His blood and physique: for the duration of what's observed as "The final Supper", merely till now He replace into arrested, Jesus informed His disciples to drink the wine, which represented His blood, and to consume the bread, which represented His physique, which replace into to be sacrificed for us; eating and eating the bread and wine represents the way that Jesus cleanses us of our sins. Jesus willingly gave His life. besides the fact that if He replace into performed, He might desire to at any time have denied His claims because of the fact the Son of God. The Jews had Him killed for being a heretic for His claims, and the Romans killed Him because of the fact they considered Him as a political dissident. He might desire to rather have escaped those costs with the help of merely denying what He were coaching, yet He did no longer. in the top, He allowed Himself to die as a sacrifice, although the Jews and Romans did no longer be attentive to it on the time.
2016-10-19 01:41:20 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There existed specific reason for the incarnation of Jesus. It has also been prophesied. I think that one of the reason for his crucifixion is to reveal to the world the ascension which again is glorious. He has shed blood due to the sins of the people around and also to quicken their way to God. But for these revelations, people would remain ignorant of His Glory. nagarajan.
2007-03-19 00:14:18 · answer #6 · answered by nagarajan s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the world killed the true historical Jesus. Organized religion will never let him rise from the icy tomb. Don't want to impede that river of money flowing in.
2007-03-19 00:15:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always love this part. What sins, whose sins when sins???Sins, such a vague term that and with such a variety of interpretations. What sins did he save us from. He died and the sins-we are told by the people in the knowhow-are still going on as strong as ever.
2007-03-19 00:26:58 · answer #8 · answered by The Stainless Steel Rat 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-03-19 00:11:34 · answer #9 · answered by mbuoro 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him. (Ezekiel 18:20)
So no.
2007-03-19 00:10:52 · answer #10 · answered by By Any Means Necessary 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, He went to the cross for the sins of mankind, those sins did not put Him there.
2007-03-19 00:14:13 · answer #11 · answered by Ted 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋