I belive this could both help with global warming, and give America a new job base for its people. This way we would be in control of the uranium, and we would know it would be a safe structure. We could start schools to train people how to run these powerplants, and go to work in other countries. Plus people who worked at these plants would be making American money, and could live like kings in these other counties,lol. This would also help other counties get off their dependancies to burn fossil fuels as there source of electricity.
2007-03-18 15:34:09 · 8 answers · asked by just m 1 in Environment
no we do not want that technology in countries that are hostile toward us
2007-03-18 15:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by Catman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One of the ironies of the global warming controversy is that the people who believe it most strongly are also those who prevent the construction of nuclear power plants. Nuclear power plants emit no greenhouse gases. The CANDU design is very safe to operate.
2007-03-18 22:46:31 · answer #2 · answered by Otis F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, because nuclear power polutes. We have strived to reduce our nuclear power plant count. Some other countries have cut them out as an option alltogether. Nucpoweris bad.
2007-03-18 22:37:04 · answer #3 · answered by like a fox 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, for all the reasons you give. There would need to be safeguards to insure that used fuel rods are not unauthorizedly reprocessed to extract plutonium, but that is the only hitch I can think of.
2007-03-18 22:38:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah yeah do that...please we need nuclear power plants in our country very badly...we somalia!
2007-03-18 22:37:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Let them build their own if they want. Leave US out of it.
2007-03-18 22:42:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sun and wind enough
2007-03-18 22:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure...why not.
2007-03-18 22:42:01 · answer #8 · answered by wildraft1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋