i just listened to an interveiw with Charles Peligreeni for the third time. He deliberately said there was nothing in the tomb but fabric, He said it was an anomaly that he could not find anything that says there were any bones in it for a thousand years.
2007-03-18 14:23:43 · 9 answers · asked by Priestcalling 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
it was a 3 hour interveiw on coasttocoatLIVE with ianPunnet.
if someone wants the edited audio file i can send it to them, its 3mb in size.
2007-03-18 14:26:57 · update #1
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page1921.html interveiw link by subscription
2007-03-18 14:29:56 · update #2
No it was not.
2007-03-18 14:27:48 · answer #1 · answered by Thumbs down me now 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The tomb of jesus may not have even been found. Despite that controversy, Jesus took a voodoo potion to fake his death and upon reviving walked out of the tomb in which he was placed. No bones or teeth or hair could then be found.
He used the same voodoo potion on Lazarus. He was an excellent magician and a great cook. In the end he was a coward who was caught fleecing people of their possesions and loved ones. He was a Rasputin, except that he mesmerized people with a smile instead of a stare.
So, missing bones aside, Jesus managed to hide from the authorities until his death by natural causes. I not only read this in a book but I heard this explanation in a public speech, saw it in a newspaper and viewed it on the internet, I was also told it by my great grandfather, received a detailed letter on it from a long lost cousin and, was possesed by the holy spirit of alcohol and weed and had a vision. Oh and I believe the government is hiding the paperwork that proves it.
2007-03-18 21:41:25 · answer #2 · answered by voodooprankster 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. At least not the bones of Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus, Joseph, and Mary were the most common names in the time of the apostles. It's like finding the tomb of a Mexican named Jesus.
2007-03-18 21:39:20 · answer #3 · answered by Peace2U 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, from what I understand, most scholars agree that the tomb was not the tomb of the Biblical Jesus. Jesus and Mary were both very common names, so this could have been anybody's tomb.
I'm atheist, but not the type that jumps at everything saying it disproves Christianity.
2007-03-18 21:26:25 · answer #4 · answered by Steady As She Goes 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
they already found his tomb once how could they find it again? and like that other guy said Jesus and mary were common names back then. now if the tomb said Jesus the messiah or Jesus Christ on it (which are basically the same thing mind you) then it would be questionable on whether they found Jesus' tomb. that is how you separate Jesus from other jesuses
2007-03-18 21:34:03 · answer #5 · answered by N E G R O P L E A S E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was and is a hoax. Read your Bible - it says that when Jesus was resurrected and then taken up into Heaven, he was taken whole - body AND soul - so there wouldn't be any bones to be found - unless the Bible story were a lie...?
2007-03-18 21:28:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That guy is absolutely right. Remember, Jesus rose from the dead- leaving NOTHING BEHIND. Ya gotta believe it!
2007-03-18 21:29:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, sorry you wasted your time.... it was re-discovered, actually first around 80's that it was discussed. it's a load of hooie.
2007-03-18 21:33:10 · answer #8 · answered by Marysia 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Meh, I dunno, I don't care, it's sensationalist archaeology anyway, and even if there were bones there's no possible way to prove whose they were.
2007-03-18 21:29:13 · answer #9 · answered by somebody 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋