2007-03-18 13:28:26 · 9 answers · asked by TOTSOS 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
We are working on Iran right now, have patience, soon we will have our hands around assmingods neck. Oh, did I misspell that lunatic midget's name? Tough Sh!t.
2007-03-18 13:37:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
confused has a limited idea of what's going on in iraq. Basicly, we started a civil war over there. People are killing each other for ultimate control of that country so that when they are in power they can eliminate the other equally fascist groups. Confused, have u ever thought that maybe a country with two sects that hate each other and want nothing more than to pee on their rotten corpses might need a tyranical dictator willing to kill is own people? at least sadam kept them under control.
2007-03-18 20:38:32 · answer #2 · answered by KerryK 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The responsible parties have been revealed. They hung the main one over a month ago.
2007-03-18 20:49:25 · answer #3 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When? .. nobody can tell the future. Probably not for a long time. Not until a US client state is established that promotes US business interests. OR until we give up on that pursuit (not likely).
The responsible party revealed? they don't need to be revealed. its the invading army, the US govt.
2007-03-18 20:39:47 · answer #4 · answered by spur_101 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush should never have gone in to begin with since he didn't have an exit strategy. He went in blindly and has caused the deaths of thousands of our children. Yeah in MY book that's an Atrocity. He should have made sure EVERYTHING was settled before gathering the "good ole boys" and barreling in. It has simply become a repeat of Viet Nam.
2007-03-18 20:45:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the war will be brought to a end with the election of the next president .
2007-03-18 20:45:16 · answer #6 · answered by endgame1915 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When the Iraqi's stop shooting at us, and responsible party is Saddam Hussein.
2007-03-18 20:40:13 · answer #7 · answered by Vultureman 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
atrocity? is that what you call liberating a nation of its oppressive regime and granting them a nation where people are not killed for believing or acting in a "wrong" way.
yes but this government is set forth by america and has civil rights in it. and no, I do not think having saddam in power was better.
2007-03-18 20:34:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
yeah its the fault of the republicans and democrats we re
in IRAQ!!!! we need a new party in this country!
i kinda agree with confused......
2007-03-18 20:34:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋