English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

would you usually be more attracted to a guy who looks he's 17 or a guy who looks like he's 35? be honest.

2007-03-18 12:49:58 · 6 answers · asked by ? 2 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

also give me your age please.

2007-03-18 12:54:05 · update #1

6 answers

looks like he's 35. you dont wanna look like ur a child molestor.

2007-03-18 12:53:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

One who looks like he is 17. I'm 21 and too young to be dating someone who looks like they are 35 plus people tell me all the time I look as if I'm 13 years old.

2007-03-18 19:53:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

35. And I am being honest. A 17 year old is not attractive to me, they are just a kid, I would feel gross.

2007-03-18 19:54:42 · answer #3 · answered by Erin 3 · 0 0

Id have to say that it really depends on what you look like at those ages. If you look like you may not be able to get on a ride at 6 flags, that may be a problem, yet, if you look like you pack in the beers and getting fat, bald and lazy, then that isnt good either. I have seen both looking incredible and both ages looking like something id rather not have to touch.

2007-03-18 19:55:20 · answer #4 · answered by bluepearlgirl 1 · 0 0

Oh, the 35-year-old, of course. 17-year-old guys smell bad, are childish, and are horrendously dressed.

2007-03-18 19:55:13 · answer #5 · answered by Cybele 1 · 0 0

35 chicks dig older men
but the truth is every chick has there own likes and dislikes

2007-03-18 19:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by 100% Español 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers