a while back they were saying that some lady got off a carpool violation cause she was pregnant? is that allowed and are there any sites with details or can you give me details?
2007-03-18 12:41:07 · 6 answers · asked by kartoon529 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
http://www.snopes.com/autos/law/carpool.asp this is the link to that story and NO! she didn't get away with that b.s.!
2007-03-18 12:47:01 · answer #1 · answered by hodgetts21 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually the way I heard the story is the lady TRIED to get out of the carpool lane violation because she's pregnant and lost. She got hit with the same fine any other violator would have.
2007-03-18 12:46:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the actual shown actuality that there is an surely life transforming into interior someone, does no longer carry any arguement to the carpool lane. it extremely is for more advantageous than a million individual in an vehicle, that receives in and out of the automobile to flow to a job or different position they are travelling. The carpool lane is for this, no longer because there are twins transforming into interior a mom, they are as one. no longer 3.
2016-11-26 21:18:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the fetus does not take up a seat, stick to the standard regulation.
2007-03-20 01:36:08 · answer #4 · answered by Smurfetta 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A woman tried to use the fetus as a second passenger defense but was unsuccessful. So no, a fetus is not considered a second passenger.
2007-03-18 12:47:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
sorry, I don't live there
2007-03-18 12:45:12 · answer #6 · answered by For_Gondor! 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋