no, you are only responsible for hitting that one vehicle. she did not maintain control and therefore she is responsible for damage to the two other vehicles she struck
2007-03-18 12:22:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by subsystem2001 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well depends.....when were your brakes last serviced and who serviced them? It if was recent & you paid to have a repair shop do it they may be liable for shoddy work. If you had your friend do it...too bad.
If this isn't the case...you're on the hook for the damages even though the other car was speeding. The speed certainly reduces your total liability, however, Joint & Several laws allow the innocent party to recover all their damages from whomever has the bigger pockets, in this case, that would be you since you have insurance.
2007-03-18 15:58:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by bundysmom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ugh, i'm guessing he would not have coverage and you will would desire to pay the deductible (or each little thing! in case you haven't any longer have been given coverage against uninsured drivers). If he does have coverage, the police will in all risk get it out of him. And yeah your coverage corporation might sue him, yet while he would not have the money it incredibly is exceptionally meaningless. I have been given hit by ability of an uninsured driving force over 10 years in the past and nevertheless have not been reimbursed because of the fact the different social gathering never paid up.
2016-10-01 03:29:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by aharon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow alot of crappy answer.
First... you are definately responsible for her car... unless you live in a state where you have to have insurance to get paid by others.
As far as the other two cars.. that will depend on your adjuster and the company. She may have overreacted when she hit the other two cars. But if she was pushed into them by you.. you pay for all the cars. (dont listen to the ignorant people who say "everyone is responsible for the car they hit")
Also... i hate when people say "the other car was speeding". How do you know? did you have a radar? YOU are at fault.. dont try to make someone who isnt seem like they are just b/c you "think" they were speeding (although they are an idiot for not having insurance so i wouldnt doubt it)
2007-03-18 12:25:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Maybe. It depends if she was cited for speeding or not maintaining control after you hit her vehicle.
More than likely you will be held responsible for causing the accident that forced her vehicle into the other parked vehicles. Not having insurance or a license does not increase her liability for the accident. She will be cited separately for those infractions.
2007-03-18 12:47:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by FormerGiGi 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I was envolved in a 3 vehicle wreck in which a van turned in front of a truck and this caused the truck to hit me. The van's insurance company was responsible for all the damages to all vehicles.
2007-03-18 12:42:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tina D 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are responsible for the damage you caused to her car, she is responsible for everything beyond that. So whatever the scrape on the back side of hers would have cost to fix, that is your part to pay, and nothing else.
2007-03-18 12:46:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by oklatom 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
No you are not. It goes to whoever hit whatever car. If that driver doesn't have insurance then the other driver better pray that they have coverage for uninsured drivers!
2007-03-18 12:22:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by hisangel28 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I agree with FormerGiGi and la428282.
2007-03-18 13:23:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Terri R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
dang, i feel really sorry for you, and i have no answer to that, bettter contact your insurancea agency, but i think u may, because u were the cause of the accident, but i wish you the best of luck!
2007-03-18 12:22:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Q 3
·
1⤊
2⤋