Morality is not scientific- more like spiritual
2007-03-18 11:15:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had parents that taught me the meaning of morals both by the way they lived and the examples they were. I have used the same principals to guide my own children.
I respect science but do not find life to need science to prove the morality in people.
2007-03-18 11:20:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cinna 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is a science of morals. It is called moral philosophy, or simply "ethics". For example, to begin with, you could define morals as a behaviour which causes the greatest possible good, and the least possible harm, in society. The "golden rule" is one aspect of such reason-based morals.
2007-03-18 11:20:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by NaturalBornKieler 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, no. Science is interested in materialism (the theory that physical matter is the only or fundamental reality, that everything in the universe, including all life, came into existence without any supernatural intervention in the process). This gives them a sense of being accountable then to no one, other than themselves. There is no need then for moral guidance as taught in the Bible.
2007-03-18 11:18:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by wannaknow 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Of course. Moral principles necessarily obtain from evolution, which applies to societies as well as to species: a society which lives by sound moral principles will survive preferably to one that does not. Hence, the proper test of a proposed action is: what would be the expected effect on society at large?
2007-03-18 11:23:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
What we see of Islam is not very good. We see people who claim the faith, murdering people on wholsale levels and on one from Islam will come out and speak against it.
Muslims will murder, Jews, Christians and other Muslims in the name of religion. Yet Islam claims Moses as a prophet, so islam must also claim the 10 Commandments also. Yet breaking them means nothing. In fact by the faith they claim that murdering the innocent will earn them a way in to heaven.
But is that what will save the soul?
Are you a good person? What a question, most of us believe that we are good people because we can look around and find someone that is far worse than we are. We can always point to the things that we think make us a good person.
But how good are we really? Dare we take this test and look at ourselves and see if we really are good? Hmmm.
If you are willing try this and see just how good a person you are.
The Good Person Test.
How will you do? Pass or fail?
Have you ever told a lie?
Doesn't matter how big or small, just a lie.
What does that make you? Before answering think about this, if I told you a lie what would you call me? A liar?
Have you ever stolen anything? Cost doesn't matter, a piece of gum, failed to give back an ink pen that you borrowed, anything.
What does that make you?
Jesus said, "You know the saying of old, you shall not commit adultery but I say that if look at someone to lust after them you have committed adultery in your heart.
Have you ever lusted?
Jesus said that hate is equal to murder.
Have you ever hated anyone?
See one day we all are going to stand before a Holy God on Judgment Day and he is going to judge us based on His Holy Law, the Ten Commandments. These are just 4 of them and how did you do? Guilty? I have broken all of these and more, what about you? How well will you do on Judgment Day?
If we break just one point of God's Law we are guilty of breaking all the law and Gods Wrath abides upon us all. Based on God's Law we are all guilty and all are deserving of punishment. But there is an out for us.
Jesus paid the price for each one of us, took on himself God's Wrath so we wouldn't have to face it on our own. Jesus was beaten, battered, bleed and died so we wouldn't have to face God's Wrath. He rose again so that we would life in his presence. Our crimes, His payment.
The real question is where will you stand on Judgment Day. Pay yourself or have it paid for you. Think about it.
2007-03-18 11:23:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dead Man Walking 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
hi, I call myself an Atheist yet i'm no longer likely. I in basic terms say that on account that is a speedy way of letting people comprehend i'm no longer non secular. i do no longer have confidence in any deity yet neither do i no longer have confidence. i'm only ambiguous on the subject of the priority because of the fact something is attainable, it only hasn't been shown yet. besides, in spite of this, I of course do no longer pass to God for training. while i think like I certainly have or am approximately to make fall off the ethical wagon and do some thing amoral, I certainly tend to spend time finding inwardly to myself extremely than outward to God. i think of approximately what's certainly important to me in existence and how lots person i'm and how lots person I wan't to be. i think of on the subject of the folk i savor and why i savor them. i'm hassle-free with myself and that i draw my ethical values from interior of myself to boot. while it is composed of forgiveness working example, i will ask myself why i'm finding it no longer hassle-free to forgive somebody. i might ask mayself what i might do and what i might prefer if I have been the guy i'm attempting to forgive. i might ask myself what I would desire to learn by ability of forgiving and what I would desire to learn by ability of no longer forgiving. i haven't discovered a reason to no longer forgive somebody interior the top. i think of alot of it comes all the way down to us being hassle-free with ourselves and being waiting to place ourselves in different persons's footwear. There are no longer any morals devoid of compassion. i haven't so some distance harm every physique extraordinarily that i comprehend of, nor have I any regrets and so some distance i think like my own ethical compass has guided me nicely.
2016-10-01 03:26:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by aharon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, well, just look at nature, but I guess if you got weak and were stumbling around, you wouldn't want me to eat you. Uh oh, why? probably because the Bible said not to. Oops!
But, geee...in stone-age civilizations that don't have a Bible, they eat each other, how interesting!!!
2007-03-18 11:16:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by pierson1953 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Morality is a science......i think
2007-03-18 11:13:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cyber 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, because the author of all righteous law is God and you can only find moral guidance in his Word ALONE [The Holy Bible]
2007-03-18 11:15:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
2⤋