English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It does happen people. Thanks for the info. Why is this so hard to do. If the person is so important, why not marry or atleast get engaged to him or her. Geez.
See below:
"In a case of first impression that several family law attorneys say will have a broad impact on custody disputes, Dallas' 5th Court of Appeals ruled in Peck v. Peck that it's within a trial court's discretion to ban a parent's bed partner, at least when the child is staying with that parent. The ruling reaffirms a trial court's power to issue such permanent injunctions that are aimed at protecting "the best interest of the child."

The July 13 opinion concerns Michael Peck and Pamela Peck, who filed for divorce in Collin County, Texas. The final order signed by visiting Judge John L. McCraw permanently enjoined both parents from having a person of the opposite sex stay overnight while the parent is "in possession of" the couple's 9-year-old son, according to the opinion. "

2007-03-18 09:58:40 · 2 answers · asked by tiaburkeangry 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Parenting

2 answers

Maybe after a divorce the person is not quick to get married or engaged. I agree that the Mother or Father should not have partners over while the child is there but they should not have to get married to have sexual fulfillment.

2007-03-18 10:08:10 · answer #1 · answered by MAY 3 · 0 0

From the sound of things, they did prohibit the behaviour.

And I agree, it should be prohibited, to expose a child to adults having sex is sexual abuse and can permanently damage the child's psychology.

Come to think of it, whether they're married or not should make no difference here, you simply do not expose children to this.

2007-03-18 10:34:42 · answer #2 · answered by netthiefx 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers