2007-03-18 08:39:49 · 17 answers · asked by AFIN 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The last chap to have an idea like this was Hitler wow. I didn't know Hitler fed the world, didn't know he could say what he wanted to do and have the press on his ***. didn't know he was for democracy wow the things I learn on the computer. jack ***!
2007-03-18 09:15:54 · update #1
no, democrats will never allow this to happen. we will win the war DESPITE them, but never with their help. they want power and they want it bad. the only way to get power is to make everything horrible. they kept complaining about the war and the economy, but the economy turned out fine and they look stupid when they say we are in a recession, so now they have to focus all their efforts on making us lose this war so they can gain power.
2007-03-18 08:44:15 · answer #1 · answered by Matt 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
At least have pelosi stop telling Generals how to run the war. She has zero military experience and has no business trying to micromanage the war.
And for the person that said saddam never did anything to this country. He had a plan to assassinate our President, if you have no problem with that then you are yourself an enemy to this country
2007-03-18 15:57:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The last chap to have an idea like that was Hitler.
2007-03-18 15:48:11 · answer #3 · answered by mrsgavanrossem 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No,The libleft defeatocrats would rather lose the war lose Our country then to win the war and maintain Our way of life. They will do anything to try to prove they are right. We are right they are left and wrong!
2007-03-18 16:07:57 · answer #4 · answered by Classic96 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to do that myself but the problem is, it would create more enemies. Countries across the world would start to see America as a danger and could possibly wage war against them.
2007-03-18 15:48:53 · answer #5 · answered by Tom S 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
first, you need to define "enemy" in a concrete definiton.
then, you would need to define which "war" you are speaking of. The "war" on terror, or the "war" in Iraq and / or Afghanistan. Three seperate ideologies.
I am not the enemy of the people of Iraq, and they are not mine. Saddam Hussein was not my enemy, nor was I his. He never did anything to my family or my country
Osama Bin Laden, al Qeada, and The Taliban, on the other hand, are MY enemy, and I am their enemy, just on the basis of my birthright and passport. Why did my government stop the severity of the war against them?
2007-03-18 15:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
the libs don't want a war they would rather be attacked and not fight back like the 90s
2007-03-18 16:54:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES if the damn Iraq's get there **** together and out the insurgents we can just shoot the bastards.
2007-03-18 16:07:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds good. So Iran or Saudi Arabia next? Syria looks a bit easier.
2007-03-18 15:49:56 · answer #9 · answered by Billy Dee 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because it's never that simple. What enemies? We're stuck in the middle of a civil war in Iraq. Which side do we destroy? and why were we even there? The war was illegal, etcetera, etcetera.
Please use your brain.
2007-03-18 15:44:03 · answer #10 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋