As a former military man should I be ashamed I am an "Anti Iraq War Protester?

Question

Denouncing a conflict entering its fifth year, protesters across the country raised their voices Saturday against U.S. policy in Iraq and marched by the thousands to the Pentagon in the footsteps of an epic demonstration four decades ago against another divisive war. Many war protesters are ex military who understand the USA is wrong to go into Iraq.

Answer 1

No not at all, if anybody has the right to be against the war it is our veterans. They are on the front lines, they are the only ones who truly know what is going on.

Answer 2

In my opinion you are wrong to take the view that you do, but whether you are ashamed, I think you answer that question on your own. By even asking, you reveal that there is that notion that runs through your brain, and it exists for a reason. Americans hate war, but we've always been willing to fight for democracy and a stable world, and that's just what this war is about. You can break down the particulars and find excuses why we should have never gone, but the fact remains that we've taken democracy and an improved life to tens of millions of people and when we leave, people will see a minor miracle that has occurred in Iraq (and Afghanistan). Don't expect to see that in your choice of media, they have an agenda. But the vast majority of the nation, Iraq, is stable and peaceful. If we can be successful in this, we could change the world in a way it's never been changed before. People who want us out are effectively arguing for the status quo, of madman regimes terrorizing their own people, the people around them, and potentially holding the world hostage with their resources, leaving their people in abject poverty while a ruling class lives in luxery. I would be ashamed to take that view, but that's just me.

Answer 3

As an ex military, you are the first who really know what war is like. Nobody has an argument with a 'just' war, that's why nations have armies.
But, fighting a war that cannot be 'won' by the US, (a civil war)
is utterly stupid. The US went into Iraq the find WMDs, (weren't any) and to topple Saddam. (mission accomplished)
So, what the hell does Bush want now?
Let the protests begin!

Answer 4

No. As a soldier that is the exact right that you fought to protect. America was build around the fact that as a citizen you can believe and speak out for what ever you want. The only reason you so be ashamed is if you didn't stand up for what you believe in.

Answer 5

?? nicely, I supply you this, you researched your question. So I definately appreciate you for going for the period of the worry. and that i checked for accuracy (on a number of it, no longer all) too. stable job!! I quite have a pair themes with this in spite of the shown fact that. one million. you're comparing apples and oranges. each and every conflict is distinctive. Our WWII losses might have doubled if we did no longer drop the bombs. could we evaluate doing that now, as Nixon curiously did for the time of Vietnam? 2. keep in mind "undertaking carried out"? replaced into that the tip of the conflict? Technically, we are actually not in a conflict precise now. perhaps it extremely is the reason the dems are upset. what's the undertaking in Iraq? First it replaced into WMD's. Then whilst that became out to be a bald-confronted lie, we shifted to "isn't it extra effectual now that Saddam isn't in means?". After that, it replaced into "we would desire to offer stability till a central authority is shaped". All that has been achieved. So, what's next? what's the undertaking? Oh, now we could consistently wait till the Iraqi military is as much as job. BTW, keep in mind how Rumsfield demanded that the Iraq military be disbanded? might it no longer have been extra effectual to maintain them in provider? 3. have you ever asked the mamma and papa of #2,582 on your stat sheet approximately how they sense? you're lacking the completed factor of the communicate by focusing on "deaths", and exhibiting us that it is no longer probable that undesirable. the factor is, we are caught, in basic terms like Vietnam and Korea. whilst are the troops coming domicile? We nevertheless shop 30,000 plus (i think of, be at liberty to the perfect option me if i'm incorrect) in South Korea. yet our troops in Korea are not death. Iraq troops are. And, the democrats ask, WHY? It has no longer something to do with loss of life expenses, yet why we are over there, what's the undertaking?

Answer 6

Absolutely not. You should be proud of yourself for standing up for your fellow military personnel who have been sent to fight and die in an unwinnable war. If we support troops, wouldn't the best support be to bring them home safely to their families and give them the best medical care available if they've been injured? Yet, that is not what this administration is doing.

I protested the Vietnam war, and I applaud you for protesting.

Answer 7

You have your own right to your own opinions, if you decide you are against the war it is up to you. Nobody should make you feel bad about how you feel no matter what side you are on.

Answer 8

You should be ashamed of yourself...being a vet, you should have more positive support for your fellow soldiers.
Because of people like you that caused us to lose VietNam and have our soldiers come home in shame.
You are what causes the Liberal hecklers to demean our soldiers upon their return...I remember vividly, being called a murderer and baby killer.....you call that support of the troops??

Answer 9

Those in the military are there to protect our country and our way of life. Whether you agree with this statement or not, the military protects your right to express your opinion about it.

All this being said, you fought to protect our freedom of speech, why would you condemn yourself for exercising that right? My hat comes off to you and I thank you for serving this country.

Answer 10

Yes.