2007-03-18 05:51:05 · 16 answers · asked by Zen禅Maiden :ジェダイ 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not for me.
I will admit that it is possible that there is some kind of force or something out there.
But the Christian God, I dont believe in. Theres just too many contradictions, and the existence of the world doesnt prove anything. Thats a cheap argument used by people who have no arguments left.
Besides, nothing can prove the existence or non-existence of any god. Its entirely a question of faith, not logic or reason.
2007-03-18 05:53:43 · answer #1 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
technology would not prepare something. It describes fashions of how the international works. If God is area of nature and obeys organic rules, then there must be info to coach that this factor observed as God is appearing upon the organic international. If there is not any action that could nicely be examined, then technology will never have the skill to declare something approximately God different than what we atheists have suggested all alongside: we've not got any info to evaluate. If there's a God, and He makes a decision to ultimately produce some form of action that could nicely be examined and empirically shown with the help of distinctive self reliant materials, then why does no longer technology settle for Him? If there is not any thank you to attempt for the life of God in a repeatable, falsifiable way, why is it so incorrect to declare, "i don't be attentive to, yet i do no longer think so?"
2016-10-19 00:07:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jedi Maiden, intelligent question.
No I don't think so. That is just a statement. But if Science has explained some things, it can be deduced that it can explain more things. How much can it prove? There's the question.
But God cannot be "proven" in that sense. Who knows there may be a God but it is definitely NOT Bible God. No God would behave in that manner.
2007-03-18 05:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by Jedi 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To an intelligent and reasonable person, yes. To someone that hates life, it is enough to prove that God doesn't exist.
2007-03-18 05:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Science has explanations for how things could exist that don't involve a god. You're going to need more than 'I can't think of how that could have happened, so it must have been my specific god'.
2007-03-18 05:54:20 · answer #5 · answered by eri 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Only if you use the simplest definition of God such as that he created everything (else, that is, everything but the god). But again, if that's your definition of God, what good is it? He still can't wake you up if you're late for class. All the other nuances such as "God is love", or "God created man in his image" still have to be bolted on to that definition, somehow.
2007-03-18 06:03:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No there is no proof of gods existance
2007-03-18 05:53:49 · answer #7 · answered by rosbif 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Its like saying that its enough to prove in pink and purple polka dot unicorns. Sorry, nope, it isn't enough.
2007-03-18 06:04:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
check my this link it explains everything and it is spelt existence and i am only 14 years old
2007-03-18 05:54:32 · answer #9 · answered by Jesus follower 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope... there is planty of evidence that suggests origins other than a magical god.
2007-03-18 05:54:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋