If you could vote who would you vote for?
2007-03-18 05:45:03 · 17 answers · asked by shukan p 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Barrack Ombama is an unknown with no track record. What he says sounds good on many counts - but like I said - totally untested as to if what he is saying will be what he does.
Bush - know enough.
If put to a vote now - neither. Till I am sure on stands when it comes to important issues such as immigration - I haven't made up my mind. Know I most def. wouldn't vote for Bush (not that I COULD since he can't run) - but not sure about Barrack Ombama either.
2007-03-18 07:30:28 · answer #1 · answered by Toe the line 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
On the points that bother me about Bush, Obama isn't very different. He is a globalist, for starters.
If Bush was running again I might vote for Obama (if he were the only choice) just to slow the stride of action during the segue between one administration and another. However, since Bush is not running again, and given other choices, I can't imagine the circumstances that would lead me to vote for Obama.
2007-03-18 12:51:36 · answer #2 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I won't vote for a globalist or anyone who supports amnesty, but if it were either Obama or Bush, I would vote for Obama in a heartbeat.
Bush was a below average student, a bigger cokehead than Obama, his first foray into F'ing up a political office was as an incompetent governor of Texas, and then he mastered the art of stealing Presidential elections by electoral vote and Supreme Court, and became the worst U.S. President in history.
Criticism of Obama's experience is simply another way of saying "I am not sure he is competent to do the job because he's black, he needs to be in the senate for another 10 years before I will be comfortable with his decision making".
2007-03-18 16:46:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why are you comparing the two? But if you must, if he parameters are the same such as experience and time spent in politics, I would have to say Barrack Obama would be better. For that matter, I know I am better than both, seriously.
2007-03-18 12:52:06 · answer #4 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How could you ask that question, when Barrack Ombama haven't being President yet or prove himself.
2007-03-18 13:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If either were the only two choices I'd vote for Mister Ed as a write in candidate.
2007-03-18 13:43:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
neither. bush is the worst president ever, and obama is a relative newcomer who hasn't been around long enough for the public to discover what kind of criminals are backing him.
2007-03-18 12:52:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
A furry rock would be better than Bush.
2007-03-18 13:49:19 · answer #8 · answered by grdnoviz 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Obama has no credability and no background to stand up with. He's all talk and no action.
2007-03-18 12:48:19 · answer #9 · answered by cadaholic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama.
2007-03-18 12:49:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋