Browsing through various news sites, I come across this headline:
"Bill Clinton to N.Y. Times: Stop Picking on Hillary"
So, slick willie wants to censure the media when it's not in his favor, but is all for them lashing on anyone else as long as it doesn't affect him pesonally?
Give me a break, Clinton is a loser.
2007-03-17 23:50:11 · 11 answers · asked by Q-burt 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
corezink -
LoL...you make me laugh. You think money is all there is? Your sad. Clinton is an adulterer, liar and a Criminal that had to be pardoned by another loser President. (Carter)
Clinton sold American secrets, raised the middle class tax by 36%, raised gas prices by 2.4%, cheated on his wife while in office, lied under oath, attacked another country to get attention off of him and much, MUCH more. Hell, under the "Clinton Years" we lost 7500 Soldiers. 200 more than under Bush and it was supposed to be a time of Peace!! WTF??
Yea...tell me another one....
2007-03-18 00:12:26 · update #1
Bryan -
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/16/111433.shtml?s=ic
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03162007/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm
2007-03-18 00:30:32 · update #2
Vernon -
Spare me your conspiracy theory links. I have more intelligence than that...I suggest you make yourself smarter.
2007-03-18 00:49:03 · update #3
David R -
I think you should actually pull up the tax plans and tax implimentations and look at the payout difference between the middle class in 1990 and in 1994.
Also, Bill Clinton was pardoned in 1977 by Carter. take a trip the the library of Congress...educate yourself.
Explain this ...why did Clinton pardon more than 200 criminals to include convicted child molesters? This is the guy you are blindly in love with?
Oh yea....forgot to mention again how Clinton had 200+ more military deaths under his watch in a so-called time of "Peace".
Your lost hero...educate....
2007-03-18 08:50:06 · update #4
Do you have a link for this? I would love to read the story. As to the content, it doesn't surprise me. There is a cabal in liberalism that does not believe in free speech for all, but rather free speech only when they approve of what is being said. This is the basis of the entire politically correct movement. This statement does not represent all liberals by any stretch of the imagination, but the number does seem to be growing. To me liberals seem to allow themselves to be ruled by emotion. They base their opinions on how something makes them feel. If something makes them feel bad, then it is bad and the rights of the opponent cannot really be important when you hold that viewpoint.
2007-03-18 00:00:55 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
You must be one of those informed republicans. First middle class or any ones taxes were never increased 36%. The newspaper article you refer to is not asking for censorship (you need to look up its meaning). Gas has gone up more under this administration than the last. And President Carter didn't pardon Bill Clinton. You look foolish when you try to make up facts.
2007-03-18 02:32:58 · answer #2 · answered by David R 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not only is Clinton a loser but his wife Hillary will be one as well. My prediction is that she will not win the Democratic primary. Many liberals I know refuse to support her and think she is too divisive to win the presidency.
Wait till the Clinton attack dogs start in on Obama by the time they are finished trashing him you will think he is the long lost son of Sadam Hussein or Jeffery Dahmer.
2007-03-17 23:55:50 · answer #3 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely, the Clinton's have been the biggest hypocrites in politics for years. The Clinton's are all about image not substance. They are quick to use the media to their own advantage but not denounce the media when their opponents use them.
I hope they pick on Hillary and her girlfriend.
2007-03-18 00:45:14 · answer #4 · answered by krupsk 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They even used the Times to cut the legs out from under Gore, with the global warming rebut...
2007-03-17 23:56:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know what scares me more...Bush and his Constitution-shredding or the prospect of Hillary as president.
2007-03-18 02:08:21 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Off hand considering where Clinton is now and where you are now, I'd definitely say you are the looser here. I wish we had the Clinton years back! We wouldn't be in Iraq now and our economy would probably be in a lot better shape. You wouldn't have to work at Burger King coming out of collage with a degree...
Give me a break, we all know who the looser is here...
2007-03-17 23:57:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Yeah- it is rather much like the baby spitting it's dummy (pacifier).
Sometimes comedy just writes itself
2007-03-17 23:53:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yea, I'd say you're pretty damn hypocritical.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfXEUDwDV5U&NR
http://youtube.com/watch?v=__BkkximiTs
Can't stand the truth, eh Cons?
Here's a libertarian's view...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lc3VCPGOQ4U&NR
One from the Cons?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yb-6j1fTaFs&mode=related&search=
2007-03-18 00:35:13 · answer #9 · answered by Vernon 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, it is hypocritical.
2007-03-17 23:53:34 · answer #10 · answered by WC 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋