English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You are a member of a team of perimeter guards and forward listening posts. There are forward enemy positions.
You are assigned to team member of a Forward Listening Posts and you have to select another member of the team who will be armed with loaded automatic rifles.
You have the option of selecting Dick Cheney or a crack rifleman who happens to be gay.
Which of the two do you select to stay in a guard positionwith you in a forward listening post during the nighttime hours.

2007-03-17 23:23:04 · 4 answers · asked by telwidit 5 in Social Science Psychology

4 answers

The gay sharpshooter. Who gives a $HlT if he's gay? Not I. As long as he does his job well, keeps the post secure, and therefore helps keep both of us alive, then I really don't give a rat's @$$ what he does in his spare time. That's his business. But of course, most people are too insecure to take that mindset.

P.S. Why was the other option Dick Cheney? Just about anyone, gay or straight, would be a better option that Cheney! Ha, ha! That worthless turd can't even handle a rabbit gun properly; it would be scary to see him with an automatic weapon!

2007-03-17 23:32:38 · answer #1 · answered by The Man In The Box 6 · 0 0

My concern is that the guy be able to do his job well. I don't care if he's gay or if his name is Dick Cheney. Just because the guy is gay doesn't mean he's weak by any means. And just because Dick made a mistake once doesn't mean he'd do it again. That said, if there was a female sharp shooter in the group, I'd probably go with her just the same. Like I said, as long as my chosen person could do the job well, that's all I care about. Nothing else should matter.

2007-03-24 12:05:39 · answer #2 · answered by qotu33 1 · 1 0

I believe that you are proposing a compound question, one that gives only two options, both of which are bad.

Of course, I would personally choose neither.

I'm going to choose the best shooting, dirtiest, low-down SOB in the group. I don't want the wimpiest, I want the toughest. I don't want a politician who can't shoot straight, I want a soldier who can and will shoot to kill.

But, I'll play your game. I'll take Chaney because he meets more of my criteria points for success than the gay guy.

2007-03-20 08:00:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

nicely if it became a forward listening submit and it became going to be attacked Imminently i does not be there. i could be back with the biggest unit. If an attack is coming near near they might pull the (OPs) in. Listening submit are no longer struggling with positions. yet whilst i became in a struggling with place I wouldnt care which one became with me as long as he maintains to be out of my line of hearth and sends some bullets down variety.

2016-12-18 16:39:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers