Just thinking...no-one outside the US understands how George W Bush was returned for a second term. If there wasn't a limit on the number of terms any president could serve, would he get re-elected for a third term? And (and I realise I'm asking for a lot of Republican PR here)...why?
2007-03-17 22:33:32 · 6 answers · asked by mdfalco71 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. He would not win a third term. I don't understand how the knucklehead won a first term. Kerry did not run a strong race. He simply imploded. The Swift Boat jerks really hurt him. Bush would not want to run again. He has done as much damage as he can. In memory of Alexander the Great, there are no more worlds for him to screw up. I really believe that if all the votes in Florida had been counted, Gore would have been president. That is an inconvenient truth that Republicans hate to admit to. Bush will retire to his ranch and be rarely seen outside of it.
2007-03-18 07:42:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would never happen and if it did America would be in a Civil War again. You do know of the Republican corruption in the 2000 election with Al Gore wining by over 500,000 with the popular vote of the Nation in the first place. This last November 2006 elections removed the States with the corrupt Republican leaders that put the majority of Democrats back into the Congress. These are the ones that cheated the system back in 2000 for America in the first place. Republicans have chose to continue their corruption and Scooter Libby's recent conviction of 4 Federal felony counts prove this with them.
2007-03-18 00:12:00 · answer #2 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He might. Enough people are still fooled by his ideas of making America great by fighting wars in the third world. And paranoia about terrorism (when in fact the dead of 11th Sept number just a fraction that the USA's right to bear arms kills every year) might swing it.
However - I'm no lover of George Bush (you might have guessed!), but if he is the man that American citizens want, why shouldn't they have him?
Isn't the '2 terms only' rule anti-democratic? If the people of USA want to elect an idiot to be their President again, shouldn't they have that right?
Similarly rules on the age and birth place of the President. If the US people wanted to elect a 12 year old Mexican boy as President, surely it's a breach of democracy to not allow this!
2007-03-17 23:10:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
To those outside the US--The reason Bush was re-elected was because the Dems put up an idiot.
And if he could run for a 3rd term-no way. Two is enough of anybody.
I am a Rep.
2007-03-17 23:04:30 · answer #4 · answered by TedEx 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That scumbag couldn't get elected anymore.The American people are fed up with his lies
2007-03-17 22:46:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's a frightening thought.
2007-03-17 22:38:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋