English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-17 21:23:45 · 26 answers · asked by rulethisworldman 2 in Sports Cricket

26 answers

Dear Indian Citizens,
Indian Cricket team had proved its position again. There is nothing strange that it lost to a unseeded team. Its only the media which overrates the Indian team. The adv companies and individual team players only benefit out of it( Bookies).
Great amount of time is wasted by the citizens watching TV hoping their team to win for a long time. Can anyone tell me that there would be no advertisements on Players even if they loose this world cup??????
In fact We will be waiting for the next world cup to come!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and again think that India will win. This goes on.
Tell me how much sportsman other than cricket earn crores of money in advertisements. If the team wins there would be big slot of programs in the TV channels on how the team won, on the other hand if the team looses there would be no criticism and max two sentence wording that the team had lost.
There are lots of talented sports person in India lacking resources for fundamental living and basic training facilities. Our great Indian cricketers earn crores of money and prove disaster when it comes to performance!
Lets show patriotism in paying taxes, obeying law, staying united and not supporting this non sense sport in this country.
Cricket is a deadly virus for the country.
Jai Hind

2007-03-17 22:03:56 · answer #1 · answered by jamuna160180 2 · 1 0

Straightaway I wanna end this controversey out here, folks.........
See now, Indian team has been selected through great amount of filtering.
I thought there was no clue in taking bowlers like Anil Kumble or Uthappa in the Indian squad.(as filters also may have holes....)
If anybody says that the Indian team had been badly selected, I think he might have gone off his nutts..........
U see, the role of confidence-level plays a crucial role in sports like cricket.
And that had ruined India at a state of hell.
India became overconfident, because their averages fared well with Bangladesh.......
The Bangladeshi's took advantage of that overconfideence and India got the blow.....
But at last we've also gotta admit that Bangladesh also played comparatively better as compared to the Indian bowling-attack....
Indian bowling always sucks as we know but I think for Banladesh it was a great toss to lose......
Again, Dravid showed his misguidance towards the team. He should've, at least, noticed the fresh dew in the grass and the ball-movement in the beginning of the game. But I think Ganguly played comparatively well although he wasted many balls......
But, here again, in the last World Cup also, India got off to a kicky start and finally reached the finals where they lost by 136 runs to Australia......
I think we shouln't bother much about this loss, but we should also go ahead and try to enter the Super eight first , then try to enter the semi's and then, the finals..........

2007-03-19 15:52:12 · answer #2 · answered by Agniva Das 2 · 0 0

Indian cricket team's performance can be summed in few words - they can beat anyone and can be beaten by anyone - such is the level of their inconsistency. They simply seem to be playing for their own interest and not as a cohesive team to assure birth in the next matches. Otherwise, how our so-called world-class players have not touched double-digit figures and former captain made 66 runs in 129 balls. Can this performance be called a world-class that too against Bangladesh by any stretch of imagination?

2007-03-17 21:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by Titu66 2 · 0 0

Indian cricket is not up to the mark. Especially the advertisement spoil the play. If we see on Bangladesh's side they are improving drastically. India's loss to Bangladesh is a matter of shame. But I think India should now concentrate on the other two matches. But I have a question can anybody forget this loss?

2007-03-18 20:11:21 · answer #4 · answered by Agnibh B 2 · 0 0

I see you are an Indian and let me tell you something. India took this match too casually and they did not had twenty keys and cash to fight against them. So just relax...but do not give any credit to dada...he made a good run, but he is a fish out of water in the whole Team India system. India now must salute Chappel for any cup vision. He is the coach after all.

2007-03-17 22:14:31 · answer #5 · answered by Wind Boy 2 · 0 0

The Indian cricket team sent to world cup is not actualy best team.
The selectors shows their partiality in selecting players. Political influence also made worst to select a good team indeed. However, the Rahul Dravid will improve his skill of captaincy and definetely will show us success in forthcoming matches. Still we had full hope with the players, ez., Rahul, Ganguly,sehvag, dhoni,Yuvraj,Irfan and Zaheer.

2007-03-17 21:39:04 · answer #6 · answered by khadersa2003 4 · 0 0

On the field, Bangladesh showed a lot of application and a real desire to win. India lacked both. There was no fire in the Indian performance. Hence the result.

2007-03-17 21:45:23 · answer #7 · answered by Modest 6 · 0 0

Bangladesh utilised the opportunities and played really well.Still India should not have lost.
They under estimated Bangladesh in spite of their victory over Newzealand in a practice match.
Batting first with out-of-form opening batsmen was a blunder on the part of Dravid.The bowlers would have been effective had they fielded first.

2007-03-17 21:57:44 · answer #8 · answered by karikalan 7 · 1 0

because india is weak team...few years back it was in form,but now there is no unity and hardwork seen in these players..i personnally feel that these indian players should not be paid a single penny if they lose the match..that will be the challenge for them...bangladesh is improving...due to over confidence india lost...each and every player must be sued for this act...

2007-03-19 09:52:34 · answer #9 · answered by Daffny 3 · 0 0

Lack of judgement after winning the toss whether to bat or to bowl. The single major fault is deciding to bat on a bad wicket. The second fault is complacency and underestimating the rivals.

2007-03-17 22:21:00 · answer #10 · answered by drpoet 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers