What is the current status of Fermat's Last Theorem?

Answer 1

Wiles' second proof is agreed to be correct, after an error was found in his first one.

Personal note: The day the NY Times announced Wiles' proof, my best friend from grad school was flying in from Israel. And we were both acquainted with Wiles there. So he showed up at my door, dead tired after a long flight, and as he walked in I said "Wiles proved Fermat's Last Theorem."

He was rather blown away.

Answer 2

many of the solutions listed right here are sturdy and maximum superb yet for non-mathematicians right this is yet another: Fermat postulated that for x^n + y^n = z^n there replace into no finished quantity answer for x, y and z the place n replace into greater suitable than 2. So for 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2 (3 squared plus 4 squared = 5 sq. it rather is a Pythagorean triplet) yet boost the flexibility to x cubed + y cubed = z cubed there are no longer any finished quantity suggestions and nor are there for any fee of n greater suitable than 2. this is his final theorum because of the fact while he wrote the theory down, he scribbled in the margin of his workstation something alongside the strains of "I even have got here upon a staggering info of this", regrettably he had run out of paper at this factor, much greater regrettably he died till now he might desire to write down the info. the subject itself has taxed the brains of mathematicians ever on the grounds that, and alter into in elementary terms in the near previous solved with the help of a professor at Oxford (uk) college after 10 immediately years engaged on the subject! And his info replace into no longer staggering in any respect, based on the 4 coloration map info it ran nicely over one hundred pages. merely approximately as quickly as he printed, yet another mathematician observed an errors in his info (A eastern student - if I undergo in strategies suited) and that they the two labored for yet another 12 months or 2 till now ultimately publishing the conventional info. So did he clean up the subject? sure, surely. replace into it Fermat's staggering info? surely no longer. So the two Fermat replace into incorrect, or immediately 4 hundred years later we nonetheless have not proved ourselves to be as clever as him. wish that helps.

Answer 3

It has been proved by Andrew Wile in 1994. For a detailed information please refer below

Answer 4

go to www.mathworld.wolfram.com