Are you going to vote for Clinton or Obama?

Answer 1

I would vote for an American for President, thank you.

Answer 2

Even though I'd vote for neither, I like how The Alchemist thinks. We don't need a 24 or 28 year long Bush-Clinton dynasty.

Answer 3

The difference is experience in how well you understand people and your self in a diplomatic way as the well being a nation is in the hands of yourself.An example is John Howard and Obama in how diplomatic relations created tentions within the media and people which should not happen .As these two Politicians should have keep there difference away from the people as misguided tentions create anamosity on both sides which should not happen .Experience should have taught to not allow polticial tension to affect the well being of the people .Media plays a part in diplomatic relations and should have know better as well as it is wrong to create tensions.

Answer 4

Neither. To me Clinton and Obama are practically one in the same. Their senate records since 04 have been nearly identical. Obama speaks much better and Clinton just has more political clout that is the only significant difference I see. I guess Edwards is not even worth mentioning. Good luck with your decision, just not one I am going to make. --- Jeff

Answer 5

Surely not Clinton, however in the end it is the voting record, policies and vision. I don't care about race, or making history. I find it shocking that people are even talking about the presidency as if you they are voting for prom King and Queen in highschool. I won't vote for anyone who has to make trips to Israel and lick boots, and kiss rings..... putting Israeli policy at the forefront and American policy in the background..... I won't vote for a person who doesn't have a backbone. I am thinking about Ron Paul more these days, but I am still open.

Answer 6

I not going to vote for either. Hillary proved that she weak by staying with bill and his stuff in the white house. What has she done for N.Y. since she been in, easy to judge her for what she done, Nothing.
Do not know Obama yet, and seems so far he only looking for one type of vote. I will have to dig in and check what he has done in office that says he should even be running. If he done something good then why is it not out here yet?

Answer 7

Obama. I dont want a possible 24 or 28 year Bush - Clinton dynasty. After all, they work for the same people.

Answer 8

OK. I'm from the southside of Chicago so I have known of Barack Obama long before he ran for U.S. Senate. Not many people know that he ran for congress in 2000 against an incumbent who was a former minister of information for the black panther party and beat the brakes off of Barack Obama 62% to 29%. This whole notion that Barack Obama isnt black enough comes from that campaign when Bobby Rush said that Barack Obama isnt from the ghetto and hasnt struggled like black people in ghettos struggle. That screwed up way of thinking is beginning to catch traction nationwide and "BLACK LEADERS" like AL "DO (hairdo)" SHARPTON are starting to question Barack Obama's blackness.

As far as experience, before he was elected US Senator in 2004, Obama was a state senator since 1997. He may not have experience on the national front but he is an experienced politician. Hell G W Bush became Governor of Texas in 1995 and 5 years later he is president. His only accomplishment in Texas was executing people. So the experience factor carries no weight with me.

Obama gets my vote....unless that dream ticket runs next year.

Stewart/Colbert in 08

Tonights WØRD

RUNNING!!!

Answer 9

Neither of them. If he's still in the race by the time of Colorado's primary, I'll be voting for Bill Richardson.

Answer 10

NEITHER!!! Can everyone get past the media hype more candidates are running besides Hillary and Barack for god's sake!!!!!!!!!!!

John Edwards
Bill Richardson
Joe Biden
Chris Dodd
Dennis Kucinich

To name only a few........

Answer 11

Hillary Clinton - and hoping to see Obama as her VP.