Had Bush not done anything and Iraq attacked America with WMD would libs have condemned him for not taking?

Question

action?

Answer 1

If purple caused white, would red be green?

Answer 2

Yes, they would have, just as they should blame him for 9/11 since he had the information available, and sitting on his desk in August that this attack was imminent.

I am personally unaware of any Iraqi citizen attacking the US other than in Iraq. Has this ever happened, does anyone have any valid information on this?

I am unaware of any WMDs in operable condition possessed by Iraq at the start of the war, we haven't found any. Does anyone have any valid information that such devices existed at that time?

There is, however, copious evidence that the 9/11 perpetrators were Saudis, that the money used to fund the operation had a connection to the Saudi. So why are we attacking Iraq, when it was the Saudis who funded and carried out the attacks?

Answer 3

NO!! Because of all the Men power that is being used in Iraq was used in Afghanistan we would have had Ben Ladin by now and wiped out most of Al Queda. Then we could have decided what to do with Iraq. However America would have had a much wanted and needed Victory! The Victory of the war on terrorism.

Answer 4

If there was WMD very valid point but there wasn't so were is the justification for a war especially if as Mr octopus said they were cheering in the streets after 9/11 so they obviously didn't want any help from the coalition to get rid of Saddam.But dont worry they got to hang him and get some form of revenge (even though he didnt have anything to do with 9/11) its just a pity they let Osama get away with murder in the process to prepare for whatever he wants to blow up next.

Answer 5

Yes they would have. The hatred for Bush is such that they will do anything to remove him from power.

According to the Mossad, and other intelligence agencies The WMDs have been brought to Syria and Iran. They were there, we sold it to Iraq. He did not use it all, he did not destroy it all, he was working on a delivery system to destroy Israel and then the US.

But hey lets leave the middle east and see how long it takes the terrorists to hit US soil again. Ask the French. When they started talking about pulling out of Algeria in 1957 the terrorists moved their actions to Paris. How long before they start hitting the US again?

Answer 6

There were no WMDs and Bush's people knew it, even if he didn't. We, I mean the world because I'm not American, were lied to and look what you have: thousands of soldiers dead, and many more thousands of Iraqis dead.

Here's what I think: Bush should have said, look, we supported him, and daddy even gave him the green light to invade Kuwait, we sold him weapons...we were wrong. Let's right that and liberate the Iraqi people. Well, that was priority number 3 or 4 originally, wasn't it?

Answer 7

even if Iraq had WMDs (which they did not) they did not have the capability to deliver them to the USA. what warheads were found (by the UN weapons inspectors BEFORE Bush kicked them out) were dismantled, antiquated and short range.


wanna play "what if"? what if the Repub Congress has backed Clinton when he wanted to go after Al Qeida instead of impeaching him for lying about a BJ?

Answer 8

A. Iraq had no intention of attacking us.

B. They could not attack us if they wanted to.

C. They had no WMDs.

D. Had Bush stayed focused on the real enemy, who happens to be making Afghanistan their home, Al-Qaida would be destroyed by now, and his approval rating would be a bit higher. Not much higher, because he is still screwing everything else up too. And no, I'm not a Liberal. I'm a Moderate. Even the Conservatives are starting to second guess the whole thing.

Answer 9

If Bush had known of the impending attack, and done nothing, then obviously yes.

If Bush could have taken reasonable steps to ensure national security (without violating federal laws in the process) and chose not to, that's negligence, and he would be blamed for being careless.

If we were attacked despite our best reasonable efforts, then there isn't anyone to blame except the attackers.

Answer 10

Of course they would. After all, they blamed Bush for a huricane.

Answer 11

Of course, no one will ever be 100% happy with a leader's decisions no matter what he does. Everyone thinks they can do a better job, so I always challenge them to go for it.