How can you prove that on the 9/11 planes there really were hijackers, when at least 9 out of the 19 hijackers specified in the Government Federal Report are alive ?
Has anyone thought of the possibility that these aircrafts were remote controlled ?
NASA performed tests of remote controlled aircrafts crashing years ago.
If the "terrorists" are alive, how can we beleive what the bush administration tells us ?
Sources:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/movie/CID/index.html
2007-03-17
17:56:34
·
12 answers
·
asked by
gabriell_021
2
in
News & Events
➔ Other - News & Events
7 of the hijackers, not 9
typo.
2007-03-17
17:58:14 ·
update #1
C J: Did you see the Sources at the bottom of the question ? Look again.
2007-03-17
18:08:22 ·
update #2
Iraq51: What if there were no pilots in the two planes that hit the WTC towers ? If they crafted a flight manifest with 7 alive hijackers, they could as easily crafted in the flight manifest other names for non existing victims on those planes. ( I'm strictly talking about the WTC planes).
2007-03-17
18:15:22 ·
update #3
s.t. : I'm not studying law, I'm a 3rd year engineering student at MIT. Maybe the world changed, but really want to know the truth, and what they tell us are complete lies.
After the tower's collapse, they immediately shipped all the remains overseas for recycling. This is one of the biggest destruction of forensic evidence in history. why ?
2007-03-17
18:26:54 ·
update #4
aaron b: I agree with you about what you said about the pentagon. That's probably the most obvious lie along with the collapse of WTC7.
The pentagon was not hit by a plane since no evidence of a plane was present, and WTC7 was demolished (even Larry Silverstein declares the building was "pulled"). Fires and debris cannot by any means destroy a steel framed building.
2007-03-17
18:33:09 ·
update #5
Guerilla M: lol dude. thats funny, but i doubt it :D
2007-03-17
18:34:27 ·
update #6
hahaha no tooJade, i looked and found you instead. :)
Too bad people like you are so anal about this subject and without even judging, you choose to ignore it and throw insults at others... Thank god you're a minority and most people in this country choose to think for themselves rather than beleiving what they hear.
2007-03-17
19:01:15 ·
update #7
A picture: hahahahahah :D that doesnt answer the question but is still funny =)
2007-03-17
19:03:16 ·
update #8
Tabs: are you crazy ? Larry Silverstein edited by theorists ? omg :D you must be nuts. Here's the proof.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
Demolishing a skyscraper building like WTC7 takes weeks and usually months of planning and installation by a team of experts. They must study the building's plan, locate the main colums, plant explosives... etc. And you're telling me they did this in a few hours ?
source:
http://www.freedom-force.org/freedomcontent.cfm?fuseaction=Bldg7&refpage=issues
2007-03-17
19:51:57 ·
update #9
i agree with you. There is not a way in heck this was a terrorist attack. The terrorists are still alive, buildings don't collapse the way they did, planes don't run into a building and not leave any wreckage, and stuff doesn't spread out on the ground if it hits the ground. To clarify, i have seen many buildings demolished being in las vegas, and if you look at the way the world trade centers went down, they were fixed. Also, at the pentagon, there was no wreckage of a plane, nobody saw a plane heading for the pentagon, and the plane hit in the farthest away part of the building not to harm anyone important. Also for flight 93, the wreckage was all spread out when they found it as if it was blown out of the sky. It would not look the way it did if it would of impacted at full speed on the ground...
2007-03-17 18:23:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by aaron b 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Larry Silverstein's comments have been edited by theorists. The building was damaged by the co lapse of the other towers and had to be demolished. Jeez,keep trying. BTW,the conspiracy nuts have gotten so loony ,they're now saying Elvis did 9/11. You're in great company.
2007-03-17 19:29:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by tabs 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
a million) The terrorists have been named on the passenger lists, and have been pointed out with the help of some of the calls made with the help of airline workers on the planes. 2) alongside with many of the different persons killed on the WTC and Pentagon. 3) have not considered this, what's the link to the BBC interviews? development 7 replace into suited in the time of a narrow highway from the WTC. curiously the fall down of the North Tower gouged a great hollow in the South face of establishing 7 (no photos ever surfaced probably via fires burning out of control in WTC homes 5 and six). development 7 additionally replace into outfitted over a Con Ed transformer station, giving it a truss shape that carried the burden of the development. The failure of this truss because of the fact of hearth led to the fall down. there is likewise hypothesis that the fires in this development that burned all day on the eleventh have been fed with the help of diesel gas tanks put in in the development to ability emergency turbines. 4) What checklist? 5) Muhammad Atta left from Portland Airport on a Colgan Air flight to Boston the place he boarded American airlines Flight 11. 6) try Flight Simulator. Even i might desire to fly a 767. touchdown is the puzzling area. 7) many of the calls have been on GTE Airphones which do artwork for the duration of flights. 8) replace into this recorded, or a wager? have not heard this recording, have you ever?
2016-10-18 23:27:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some of the men named as hijackers on 9/11 are alive and have been victims of identity theft. These ID thefts were said to have occurred as long ago as 1995.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
Looks like some of the 19 suspected hijackers stole the identities of law-abiding Middle Easterners, further complicating the investigation
2007-03-17 18:19:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by sunshine25 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
hmm. are you studying law or something similar? or are you in a special "home" for "special people" who can not distinguish real/reality from fiction. common on man -- this subject was exhausted infinitum -- get going with your life --the world has changed since 9/11 and you are deadly wrong if you want to resurrect the dead out of their graves or wherever they happen to be...rest your case or ask help from the nearest facility around your town. PS. the answer is meant to help you, seriously go to a movie and relax.
2007-03-17 18:18:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by s t 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think we should believe nothing this administration tells us. They have been lying about so much and the control of our media is disgusting. Look right after 9/11 the respected journalists quit or retired.Jennings died of lung cancer,Brokaw and Rather both left. In their case I'm sure it was their moral compass saying "no" to this lack of freedom of the press. I know its the case for Dan Rather, he left and is doing some internet venture news program. The truth is coming out, more and more.
2007-03-17 18:13:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by stephenmwells 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Mohammad Atta and his cronies are still alive? Why? Did you have a beer with them? Those who took aircraft on 9/11 did as they intended to do. One aircraft failed because passengers assaulted them, unfortunately they perished.
Are you a terrorist sympathizer?
2007-03-17 18:06:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by C J 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
What about the dead pilots? Are you so fanatical that you think the government took the pilots and flight crew off and his or killed them? You think the families of the pilots haven't researched this? Good grief.
2007-03-17 18:06:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by iraq51 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Who were you in the book , "Useful Idiots " ?
2007-03-17 18:45:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by missmayzie 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
didn't even have to read your whole question to know you must be a si-fi fan
2007-03-17 20:41:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by hmm 6
·
0⤊
1⤋