Iv'e heard that some people say TNA sucks and some people say that the WWE is overrated, so do you like TNA OR WWE????
2007-03-17 17:13:25 · 17 answers · asked by The Phenom 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
WWE ALL THE WAY ...
T N A ... S U C K S ... !!
2007-03-17 17:17:42 · answer #1 · answered by Triple H 5 · 0⤊ 5⤋
They both have their strong points and weaknesses. TNA Pros: More talented wrestlers than WWE, and the potential for more action. generally more exciting pay perviews and some really innovative matches like Ultimate X. WWE Pros: More time which means they can build their storylines more in depth, and don't have to rush everything meaning their shows flow better. Better production values, more prestige. Have some true legends on their roster like Undertaker, Michaels, Ric Flair and Benoit which lends sentimentallity to their product. Wrestlemania (even this one looks to be a stinker) WWE Cons: rosters are too spread thin meaning that you only have a few guys on each show capable of delivering a good match. Lots of blush_t to wade through to get to the actual wrestling. Cares more about the casual wrestling fan than the true hardcore fan meaning you often get paper Champions like John Cena just because the little kiddies and the women love him and buy his merchanidise. TNA Cons: Not enough time, everything has to be rushed. It is hard to see TNA live, when they only run a few house shows a month, and tape their impacts exclusively in Orlando Florida, and have only had to day one ppv outside of Orlando.
I prefer TNA because I like the modern breed of wrestler like AJ Styles, Samoa Joe and Christopher Daniels, their pay per views always have at least one match that totally delivers, where WWE is a crap shoot. I watch Raw just about every week and Smackdown from time to time. I usually order the big WWE Pay per views like Mania and Summerslam, but rarely ever miss TNA pay per views. for $ 29.99 TNA delivers much more than what a more expensive WWE pay per view does.
2007-03-18 02:47:39 · answer #2 · answered by Bobby the Brain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE. I might've said TNA like a year ago... but ever since Russo took over the booking... well... i cant look at TNA the same for now...
2007-03-18 01:21:43 · answer #3 · answered by Danny S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As I've stated many many times b4, TNA has better in ring action while WWE has better storylines. And they're funnier too!! That promo the Rock did on RAW last week was hilarious.
2007-03-18 00:28:39 · answer #4 · answered by HULK RULES!! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I watch wwe all the time and TNA sometimes, TNA's in ring performances are better but their commentators really grate on me. I watch it with the mute on.
2007-03-18 01:28:02 · answer #5 · answered by celticthor 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tna that wrestling show is way better than wwe it doesnt look staged lol tna is a good show even though i dont like wrestling that much. and yes wwf is way too overated
2007-03-18 00:17:13 · answer #6 · answered by The Helper 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I like WWE way better than TNA
2007-03-18 00:21:15 · answer #7 · answered by Just Ask :-) 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I watch WWE more than TNA.....but if there is no special on TV ...TNA will be a timepass for me
2007-03-18 02:36:24 · answer #8 · answered by RatedR RtZmE (KFC OFC PAC) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watch and like them both but I prefer the WWE.
2007-03-18 00:16:35 · answer #9 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I watch them both... Why do people have to say one or the other, they both provide entertainment value.
2007-03-18 00:49:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
WWE
it sees east video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjvbqNKwdiY&NR
2007-03-18 14:52:43 · answer #11 · answered by M ª R ¢ õ § 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋