There have been 10 + James Bonds Movies all in order except for the last one. The last one was supposed to be how James got his 00 status and he did thus starting the movies. That should have been the first one therefore been in a longer time ago but it was scened in 2006. Can someone explain?
2007-03-17 16:59:45 · 9 answers · asked by linkin_brandon 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
There's actually been more than 20 Bond films.
They're all self contained stories, and do not necessarily have to chronological, unlike Harry Potter or Lord of the Rings.
Casino Royale is indeed the first of the Bond books by Ian Fleming, and the producers felt it was a good story.
2007-03-17 17:05:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The answer is they don't care anymore what they do to the story line. They stopped caring when they brought Sean Connery back to play Bond in Never Say Never Again. That makes him an old Bond past retirement age. There was also the original Casino Royale which was a comedy and had hundreds of Bonds. So, like I said. They don't care.
2007-03-18 07:06:37 · answer #2 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Were those movies supposed to make sense?? I definitely missed something in the years I watched them, beginning decades ago. I'm sure more "serious viewers" saw a "scheme" or "plan" or overall whatever, but I can tell you seriously that never, in all my viewing of James Bond movies did I ever look for a "bigger picture". But then, I guess that's obvious by my answer. God Bless you.
2007-03-18 00:11:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All the Bond movies are supposed to be movies in itself with no chronological order.
All the Bond movies have 1 storyline: Save the world from terrorists. Do you really need to watch them in any particular order to understand the plot?
2007-03-18 00:09:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They don't need to make sense as long as Daniel Craig continues to be James Bond! What a hottie! Ladies, do you agree?
2007-03-18 00:29:35 · answer #5 · answered by Renee 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I totally agree with LORD Z. They should sell the Bond Franchise to someone who wants it.
2007-03-20 21:18:48 · answer #6 · answered by westphalia1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because james bond is a fantasy movie and every single fantasy movie has no sense
2007-03-18 00:08:37 · answer #7 · answered by girl 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i thought it was weird how they switched this time frame so drastically in this new one too... i guess just trying to please the new modern-day stupid public or something.. i know it doesn't make sense though why they didn't follow through normal with the rest of them..
but personally i LOVED the new james bond movie... so idk..
2007-03-18 00:06:37 · answer #8 · answered by coolio 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's called "suspension of disbelief".
Also, please don't forget that THEY ARE MOVIES!
2007-03-18 01:15:55 · answer #9 · answered by dweed 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋