the difference will only be seen if you are doing some processor intensive task running. Encoding, video rendering, and other things, things are quite processor intensive, and in that case, the Core 2 Duo 1.83 GHz will be faster. This is mostly due to the slightly improved architecture. If you are just word processing and surfing the Internet, then there will be practically no difference, and it isn't worth the extra $100. it is like a 64
2007-03-17 17:09:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Intel Core Duo processors are 32-bit which means that they can only process 1/2 the amount of commands at once as a 64-bit processor. Intel Core 2 Duo Processor are 64-bit and generally have higher processor clock speeds.
2007-03-17 18:10:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by lapyramid 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
times 32 and times 64
2007-03-17 17:01:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by fade_this_rally 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
They are basically the same thing . . .a single processor with two cores which produce about 40% more processing speed.
A core solo is a single core processor.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=utf-8&fr=slv8-fp&p=core%20duo
2007-03-17 17:29:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Say What? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
core duo: dual core processor designed for laptops
http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/asmo-na/eng/products/mobile/processors/coreduo/feature/index.htm
core2 duo: dual core processor
http://www.intel.com/products/processor/core2duo/
core2 extreme: quad core processor
http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/asmo-na/eng/products/desktop/processor/processors/core2extreme/feature/index.htm
Wiki definition for core duo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_Duo
2007-03-17 17:11:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Vincent 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
2 is better.. its like 4
2007-03-17 17:01:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
core2 is more advance it is the version up.
2007-03-17 17:01:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋