Who thinks Paul London and Brian Kendrick are just a lame version of the Hardy Boyz?

Question

I certainly do.

The only reaosn they're still the smackdown tag champs is because, essentially, Smackdown has no good tag teams to oppose them.

Answer 1

while you are correct about their being no one to challenge them they are ore like the rockers than the hardy boyz. both a little undersized both high flyers. now it is just a question of which one will become a heal and turn on the other. much like HBK turned on marty genetti so many years ago.

Answer 2

I don't think they're anything like The Hardy Boyz other than the fact that they do some high flying moves. No one can ever be even a lame version of The Hardy Boyz. They are in a class all their own. I just hope they move one of the Hardyz to the other brand so they can team up more often.

Answer 3

No, Paul London and Brian Kendrick could be greater than the Hardy Boyz (but the Hardy Boyz are still unique and unreplaceable). It's just that the WWE doesn't used them to their full potential.

Answer 4

The Hardyz are irreplacable and Londom and Kendrick are just there. They are all great hight flyers, but London and Kendrick will not HOF when The Hardyz will.

Answer 5

london and kendrick are a lamer version of the rockers not the hardy boyz

Answer 6

Me..
They're doing their best to be like Hardy Boyz..
But that ain't gonna happen man!

Answer 7

I disagree with you because i know when both of the were wrestling in singles before the wwe put them togteher.They have a lot of talent and can actually wrestle but they are very much underrated in the wwe.

Answer 8

Ditto.

Answer 9

MEE!!!
i love the hardyz soo much theyre awesome
!!!!

Answer 10

th=ere both good ... but hardyz are a bit better