is he supporting the terrorists? Obviously the democrats recognize that the American people want change. They are not going to give old Bushie a blank check anymore.
When Bush vetoes the spending bills for Iraq, he isn't going to turn around and get what he wants. Congress won't allow it.
So is Bush going to be the terrorist against our troops?
Sort of reminds me of a toddler throwing a tantrum...smashing all his toys because his momma won't buy him the newest "toy".
2007-03-17 14:47:29 · 13 answers · asked by brass 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Has he vetoed a bill in the last 6 years?
I really doubt that he will.
2007-03-17 14:50:08 · answer #1 · answered by Sarge1572 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
George Bush, will need to learn to get along, if he don't cooperate he will get absolutely nothing out of congress. Even the obstructionist Repuglican senators will have to choose their battles carefully or they will be nothing that they will be able to do to save George from going down as the lamest duck president ever, they also have to remember that a third are up for reelection and the American people are watching closer then ever. There will have to be compromises but things will get done. Do not forget to vote in 08.
2007-03-17 14:58:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats do no longer prefer to cut back investment on out troops, they simply choose a timetable to get out. If Bush vetoes the invoice, the Democrats are probable to bypass one with out time tables. i think of this invoice replaced into kinda in basic terms the thank you to assert, "nicely, we tried getting them out!" --which they do choose them out of direction, they simply had to nicely known Bush might veto it. They have been attempting to make a sturdy political stance. besides, the troops are going to be left over there and there is no longer something the Dems can do approximately it, then they're going to could supply them money.
2016-10-02 07:32:34 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not all the American people "want change"... When Bush won in '04, the Democrats still said they were in the majority... Now that they are in the majority?
We don't have a direct democracy for a reason, and I am glad we don;t have sheeple running this country.
2007-03-17 14:51:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would prefer that Bush buys military armor instead of funding tropical fish.
Tropical fish are worthless against the terrorists.
2007-03-17 14:52:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Last time I checked the cut and run Democrats were the terrorist lovers
2007-03-17 14:50:46 · answer #6 · answered by jesus 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I will bet you my entire life savings that George W. Bush does NOT support Al-Qaeda, or any anti-American terrorist groups.
2007-03-17 14:51:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Until a democrat comes up with a decent plan... there is no alternative. You can't just leave now... besides how stupid would it be to announce the date of a pullout? Gee, insurgents... we are going to be gone on this date, be good after we leave... typical lib, all talk, no practical reasoning.
2007-03-17 14:50:59 · answer #8 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Bush has a hard job that no one can be perfect at. He tries really hard and does his best he does a good job of it.
2007-03-17 14:51:30 · answer #9 · answered by Golden Ivy 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Bush just needs to go!
2007-03-17 14:50:13 · answer #10 · answered by Heyhey 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋