because she's bill clinton's wife and she's an independent woman!!!!!!!!!!!!! that scares SOME conservatives!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-17 13:45:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by J 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
This can take a long time.
1. When Bill was in our rights where taken away.
2. She shouts when she speaks( I don't want to hear that for 8 years)
3. She moves to what ever is popular at the time
4. She will use polls to decide her policies
5. She thinks she is strong for sticking will Bill after all of his cheating (A strong women would never take that)
6. She be Little stay at home moms ( What am I supposed to do stay at home and bake cookies)
7. She has too much scandal in her past
8. She failed at her universal health care plan
9. She voted for the war, but now wants to force a withdrawl
2007-03-17 20:50:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
That is a great question. Not easy to answer. People have so many reasons to hate...But a powerful women really gets them going! Let me list the reasons I think, I myself do not have any reason to hate her.
1. Powerful women, intimadate men!
2. A lot of women thought she should have left President Clinton...not their business..I wonder would they have left him!
3.She is outspoken in women that =s ***** in men it =s power!
4. Some may hate her views.
5. She is a democrat...So I guess republicans R not fans.
6. She isn't all dolled up! She is plain..some don't like that!
7. She could be the 1st women president! Maybe people R afraid of that! Or maybe their afraid she will do a good job!
Well I guess that covers it, I can't think of any thing more.
2007-03-18 01:37:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by bodacious baby 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
There is not NEAR as much hate for her as there is for GW Bush. Besides the answers that you have now, I do not HATE her but I detest her ruthlessness. For example::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES by Paul Harvey
>
> Conveniently Forgotten Facts Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers
> decided that a fellow black panther named...Alex Rackley needed to die.
>
> Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
>
> Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends
> tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water
> on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley. Panther member
> Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head.
>
> Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north
> of New Haven, Conn. Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what
> happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later,
> only one of the killers was still in jail.
>
> The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard
> and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an
> assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't that
> something?
> As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head and a few
years
> later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only
in
> America!
>
> Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water
> for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
> California School Board.
>
> How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?
>
> Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to
> the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to
> shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused
> Black
> Panthers during their trial.
>
> One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan
> Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a
> California School Board. He was head of the US Justice Department's Civil
> Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.
>
> O.K., so who was the other Panther defender?
>
> Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member?>
> Is this other Panther apologist CCow an assistant college dean?
>
> No, neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law
student
> at Yale University at the time. She is now known as the "one of the
smartest
> woman in the world" (and may well become the next president of the United
> States). She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of
> New York----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>
> And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story".
>
> Just a reminder as she runs for President
2007-03-17 20:52:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by just the facts 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Cons have given complete control of their mind, body and soul to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly! They are the only ones allowed to direct their thoughts, their actions and their words. This is the reason Cons hate Hilary because they are told to hate her by Fox News and Rush Limbaugh!
2007-03-17 20:48:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yahoo Con 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Another Clinton in office would mean America being under the thiefdom of either a Bush or a Clinton for a total of at least 32 years, 36 if Hillary is re-elected (many now acknowledge that H.W. Bush pulled the strings as VP during the Reagan era), and they still say anyone can become President! What a pathetic joke!
Forecasters are already predicting a success for the Senator, meaning Americans will probably be living under the same hierarchical oligarchy that brought them rampant illegal immigration, the devaluation of the dollar, the gigantic deficit, 9/11, and hatred of the U.S. around the world.
The electorate got bored of drinking Coke so now the establishment is going to provide Pepsi.
Clinton voted for the Patriot Act and she voted for the war in Iraq, but so many Democrats are blinded by the cult of personality that they will overwhelmingly vote to put this crime family back in office. While we have made some progress in educating liberals as to the phony staged consensus of the left-right paradigm, the fact remains that a majority still see the White House as some kind of political super bowl, where the success of their 'team' is the be all and end all - to the expense of America as a whole.
This is important, this next part about the Bilbergers.
Clinton's campaign manager has already compared Hillary to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and has outlined her style as "Strong on foreign policy. People have got to know you are going to keep them safe."
This translates as more war, more dead Americans, and a further desecration of the tattered shreds of what's left of the U.S. Constitution. Thatcher was also strong on her own people and left the common Brit much poorer than when she gained power. She was known as the Lady of the Munitions.
Billary is the ultimate elitist and represents the Democrats supposed base, the poor and downtrodden, about as much as Lindsay Lohan represents grace and dignity. Actually, Lindsay is a far better actress. She was sure to inform the likes of David Rockefeller of the Illuminati and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Head of the Black Nobility, as to her presidential aspirations during her visit to last year's Bilderberg conference in Ottawa Canada.
Bilderberg has a proven history of acting in a kingmaker capacity. Both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair attended before becoming President and Prime Minister. So did Canada's Steven Harper and California’s Arnold Swarzenegger. I do not joke that Arnold is to mount the American throne as Dictator of the Fourth Reich, not at all.
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=133&contentid=1749&page=1
The Clintons and the Bushes personally profited from massive drug smuggling operations through Mena, while Clinton was Governor of Arkansas. Alex Jones has interviewed multiple former CIA officers who were unloading the cocaine. Bush Sr, met eleven times with the Clintons in the year before Clinton announced his run for President. Teenagers Don Henry and Kevin Ives were murdered for accidentally witnessing a CIA cocaine smuggling operation in Mena. Bill Clinton aided in the cover up, as well as the money laundering.
The Clinton-Bush relationship is a long and fruitful one. Both families have been known to vacation together in more recent times. On CBS, Clinton revealed that he looks upon the Bushes as a surrogate family, and how Barbara Bush refers to him as "her son". Is this really a picture of two distinct and opposed political ideologies pitted against one another?
In 2005, George W invited both Clintons as guests of honor and praised them to the hilt as he unveiled portraits of the two to be hung in the White House. Bush described him as having "...a great compassion for people in need... a man of
enthusiasm and warmth". This after Bush's 2000 campaign was built around Clinton having no honor or dignity whilst in the White House.
Hillary has been part of the governing circle for too many years. She is just another corrupt politician from a slick and dishonest previous administration.
She flouts her Illuminati connection.
http://whale.to/b/hilary.html
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/hillary_waco.htm
Waco & Hillary
2007-03-17 21:18:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
I don't hate Hilary, I just hate her in any position with power over my rights.
2007-03-17 20:51:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
my personal reasons for not liking her are simple. she stayed with bill clinton after he had an affair and then lied about it. i personally think she is only with him for the political gain. i have no respect for someone who has no respect for herself.
and im a democrate, 08bama
my political reasons are because i think she is a republican in democratic clothing
2007-03-17 20:47:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hilary Clinton believes, advocates, and still agrees with the illegal invasion of Iraq....I do not ...to me she is whats wrong with America today.
2007-03-17 20:47:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by dstr 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Personally I think she is a phony and power hungry person who could give two shits less about the American People she says she represents. She's from Illinois, is the Senator of New York, faked a Southern Accent recently in South Carolina...to name a few...
2007-03-17 20:45:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by i_love_my_mp 5
·
5⤊
2⤋
I know a lot of people don't think the USA is ready for a woman president. I know others don't like where she stands on issues like abortion, gay marriage, immigration, and all those other controversial issues. That's just the people I know. Personally I'm not sure about her.
2007-03-17 21:02:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Sonda C 2
·
0⤊
2⤋