Isn't she foot-dragging on stopping the war, along with the rest of the Democrats?
2007-03-17 10:49:47 · 12 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You probably voted for those Dems don't you feel foolish. They are wasting their time in front of her house. They can't do anything to stop the war and neither can she. God Bless our troops. I can't wait for more of their choices on how to spend our tax money like these good ones: 24 million dollars for spinach growers in California, 74 million for dairy farmers in Wisconsin and finally 273 million for peanut storage in Georgia what a joke they are so glad they are there aren't you?
2007-03-17 10:55:22 · answer #1 · answered by jason s 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
While I generally disagree with protesters period, I think she has asked for what she's received from the far left. She has made promises to them that she has not kept and won't because it's just not politically expedient for her to do so. While we have the right to descent in this country, protesting is generally counter productive and sensless, the time could be put to better use. On a personal level I support President Bush, the troops and the war.
2007-03-17 11:14:27 · answer #2 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think she's foot-dragging. I think the Democrats have a big job to do in a few months, when it took Bush 4 years to create this mess. They aren't exactly operating with cooperation from the Administration or the Republicans either. I didn't expect miracles, right now I'm just grateful for the checks and balances and their continued efforts to try and find a solution to this incredibly complicated mess.
As far as the protesters go, as long as they protest peacefully, they can do it outside of MY house.
2007-03-17 11:33:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I have not got any objection to any citizen donning a gun for risk-free practices against criminals and tyrants. That suited is obviously spelled out in the form even with what the enemies of freedom from the two ingredient of the aisle will inform you. The 2nd replace and the SDA Act of the State of Oklahoma supply me that suited why ought to Rep Kuhl be excluded.
2016-10-18 22:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When asked on this site about protesting Bush at the Pentagon instead at Lafayette Park across from the White House they responded "They can protest anywhere they want to." So I guess the answers is " They can protest anywhere they want to"
2007-03-17 11:09:08 · answer #5 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I fully agree, and if the Democrats don't get on the job and start acting like they are doing everything they can to stop this war, I will be voting for another party next November
2007-03-17 10:54:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
IMO, protesting outside someone's home should be off limits--not so much legally than morally. His/her office is fair game.
2007-03-17 10:59:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with them protesting outside her house.
I do agree that the current Bush plan of indefinite goal-less deployment in Iraq is foolish, and I do agree that Congress should take decisive steps to bring most of our troops home.
But I don't know what those specific protestors were suggesting as an alternative, so I can't say whether I agree with them in particular.
2007-03-17 10:54:10 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Protests are for losers, I don't care who or what they are protesting. It always attracts the worst people.
2007-03-17 11:09:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If we're lucky, they'll demand a recall election.
2007-03-17 11:27:49 · answer #10 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋