2007-03-17 09:22:55 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Does he teach his children that if you betray your government like the Republicans and Bush (Scootey Libby), it's OK, because somebody from the Democratic party did something wrong 4 years ago, 12 years ago? Clinton did something wrong, so Bush can start a war based on lies, and be responsible for outing a CIA Agent, who was worknig to protect Americans from the WMD that he claimed our enemy had, and we should look the other way,,,,,,,,, is this what Sean Hannity teaches his children and America's children?
2007-03-17 09:32:09 · update #1
Because a Faux News tactic is the "Guilt by Association" technique. Interestingly enough they only use it against Democrats and not Republicans. Fair and Balanced? I don't think so.
2007-03-17 09:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by Charlooch 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm not quite sure what you're asking. But, in general, many of us are outraged that Sandy Berger only got a slap on the wrist for stealing 9/11 related documents from the National Archives (he admitted to stuffing them down his pants). He also admitted to hiding some under a construction trailer near the Archives building, and then destroyed some of them - and these were documents which were not flattering to the Clinton Administration and their lack of attention to the events that led up to 9/11.
OK. Politics is politics. But the level of outrage the dems express over the whole Valerie Plame thing (where even an aggressive prosecutor never found a true crime to prosecute) is disingenuous in comparison.
2007-03-17 17:01:42 · answer #2 · answered by Apachecat 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sandy Berger is without a doubt, a strong employee of the Clinton's, and was willing to go to jail if necessary. Sean Hannity reminds the American public that this isn't what is needed in the White House. And the fellow that made a ' profound' statement about Mr. Hannity just before my answer, maybe he hasn't had his daily Kool-Aid yet. Go Sean, Go !!
2007-03-17 16:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by fuzzypetshop 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sandy Berger committed some serious crimes and nothing more than a slap on the wrist. He stole sensitive government documents. Don't you agree that the punishment seems awfully light for what he did?
On the opposite end of the criminal spectrum is Mr. Libby. He was convicted of a crime when no crime was committed. Should there be equal justice in the US? I think so.
2007-03-17 16:29:00 · answer #4 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Probably because he stole confidential information that was directly related to the cover up in the Clinton investigation during his presidency. Has said he would voluntarily take a lie detector test over 2 years ago and has yet to do so. Sounds like a guilty man cover up the ways of a bad president.
2007-03-17 16:29:46 · answer #5 · answered by InTheWright 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Don't you think it would be interesting to see the outcome of just one investigation into Liberal crimes? Jeffers? Berger? Somehow they just get conveniently swept under the carpet. Maybe Hannity is just trying to remind us that these cases were really never resolved.
2007-03-17 20:21:11 · answer #6 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because Berger IS an actual criminal, stealing and destroying Classified Documents from the Justice Department.
2007-03-17 16:27:10 · answer #7 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because little Sean Hannity has a Napoleonic complex so bad revenge is all his itty bitty pinhead can think about anymore, due to his 15 minutes being up last November.
2007-03-17 16:27:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Berger will be used in ads against Hillary should demo crates be foolish enough to nominate her for president
2007-03-17 16:26:20 · answer #9 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Just pointing out how disingenuous the democrats in Washington are when they profess to be so worried about national security.
2007-03-17 16:27:50 · answer #10 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋