Was Achilles a real Greek warrior?

Question

Yes or No and a simple because.

Answer 1

Yes Achilles was a real Greek warrior, with his most famous exploit being the Battle of Troy (which actually existed and was found within the past 5 years). Supposedly Achilles was almost immortal because his mother was unable to complete the job since his father interrupted, thus his heel was the only place that was vulnerable on his body. Thus the Achilles heel.

Answer 2

Achilles is a real Greek warrior. Homer wrote about, Dante wrote about, and there was a movie directed by Wolfgang Petersen that star Brad Pitt as Achilles. So he's real enought to me.

Answer 3

Short answer: no. The Iliad might have been based on fact, but with a lot of embellishment, and just because Dante referred to him doesn't make Achilles a literal person.

Answer 4

He was a warrior, but not Greek. In Bronze age there are not Greeks. Greek tribes have come later, and the Minoan peoples were settled up southern, in Philistine.

Answer 5

yes he was a real greek warrior

Answer 6

probably Achilles; Alexander grow to be extra a regular than a warrior. In heroic protection stress epics, this has continuously been the custom; the 2d in command is mostly a extra appropriate warrior, than the final or king. Arthur had his sir Lancelot, Alexander's suitable hand guy grow to be standard for his conflict prowess yet ought to no longer command nicely worth a damn, whilst in China, one in each and every of Zhao Zhao's opponents, grow to be the effective (yet treacherous) warrior Lu Bu. In protection stress traditions and heroic epics the international over, the 2d in command is often the extra appropriate soldier or warrior, than the chief. in spite of king David, it grow to be his suitable hand guy, the final who killed David's son Absalom (forget approximately his call) who grow to be the extra appropriate warrior. the 2d in command is yang, to his king's ying. The king is the brains, whilst the 2d in command is the arm. that's the king's activity to think of, and the 2d in command's, to combat. whilst ships, armies, kingdoms, and so on, have been set up like this, they continuously met with fulfillment. whilst nevertheless a stable fighter himself, the final or king, for a protection stress to prevail, ought to on no account be stronger than his 2d in command. Achilles, like Alexander's suitable hand guy, grow to be strictly a warrior, no longer a commander, in accordance to Homer's epic. So, sorry; Alexander would not win that trial by employing wrestle. against Leonidas inspite of the indisputable fact that, now that ought to be a distinctive tale.... Even interior the real international, i in my view think of Butler's Leonidas, smacks the crap out of Pitt's achilles, any day of the week.

Answer 7

Probably he was but not as a half-god of course. I think we must believe the historian of that time, because, history we know is about what they said to us.

Answer 8

most Greek heros are believed to be based on real people, and their exploits have been exagerated with generations and generations of storytelling.

Answer 9

Yes he was but a real heel too.

Answer 10

isnt achilles a tendon in your leg???