Mugabe is just as bad.
2007-03-17 08:36:49 · 13 answers · asked by Ahwell 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
There are plenty of examples of tyrants making their own countrymen miserable. You can't fight them all. It has to be in America's national interest to do so. Contrary to what many others might think, the continuous flow of oil at fair market prices is still vital to the security not only of America but the free world and is worth fighting for.
If terrorists that threaten us start to set up shop in Zimbabwe then you will see us involve ourselves because it will be in our interest.
I do feel very sorry for those people and angry at the UN for what they have done and failed to do over there as well.
.
2007-03-17 09:02:52 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you're retaining that Saddam Hussain invaded his very own u . s .... Your quote; "Did Saddam Hussain made a mistake by making use of invading neighboring Iraq" nicely he were very sturdy at killing his muslim brothers for years earlier, humorous the way you ignoramus muslims look to the kaffir for help whenever you get into deep problem, yet then this is the relaxing aout being muslim, 2 confronted and blissfully stupid so no it wasn't a mistake as you propose asking.
2016-12-18 16:15:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mugabe may even be worse than Saddam, but that's not the point. The point is, there's no oil in Zimbabwe!
2007-03-17 08:54:33 · answer #3 · answered by texasjewboy12 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Mugabe is worse than Saddam. Just google the Zimbabwe "rape camps." We aren't going in their because they don't have anything we want.
2007-03-17 08:39:29 · answer #4 · answered by jimmyb20032003 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No oil, that would be the first answer. It would not be politically correct. Zimbabwe has nothing America wants. Proving that America does not give a dam for the people.
2007-03-17 08:47:45 · answer #5 · answered by cheryl l 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The war in Iraq started as a search for weapons of mass destruction.
Bush just wanted a war.
2007-03-17 08:39:16 · answer #6 · answered by Life Is Illusive 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
it wasnt to liberate them from Saddam Hussain's tyranny, it was to steal the oil and start a civil war. bush doesn't care about the people, he cares about himself.
2007-03-17 08:39:01 · answer #7 · answered by rt1290 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There's no oil in Zimbabwe.
2007-03-17 08:52:48 · answer #8 · answered by catrionn 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because these countries don't own gold, oil or any viable export for the U.S., we maintain a monetary profit from them by selling them weapons and arms.
We don't mind the killing as we are profiting from the sell of military equipment to both sides. Either we will profit for oil and war or we will profit from the sale of war machines.
WE ARE THE CORPORATE STATES OF AMERICA! (and don't you forget it!!!)
2007-03-17 08:45:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
SO true. so very true. i guess because they're not a threat to us and we have no beef with them. and they have nothing we want. and the world doesn't care about Zimbabwe.
2007-03-17 08:45:42 · answer #10 · answered by KOI 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋