wouldnt stopping terrorism pretty much mean we;ll have to annex the world by force?

Question

the arguments for sound alot like the arguments to take out the indians in the 1800s. when will america stop having to kill people to be prosperous? or is that how it will always go

kill was the wrong word.....be in fear of, is the actual idea....afraid of indians, afraid of nazis and japs, afraid of reds, now afraid of islam

and im not equating terrorism to the nazis....besides terrorism has turned into sudversion. we created a whol new thing here

Answer 1

I say we take it all. If Saddam spent as much on military equipment as he did palaces,he might still be alive putting people in wood chippers.It's his fault.

Answer 2

Such a warped view of the world you have. It is more profitable to trade with people than to kill them. Once the Indians of the 1800's gave up on terror their lives improved(Wisconsin elected one as Governor for 4 term, Tommy Thompson) > Terrorism will go away when terrorists stopcommiting terror<

Answer 3

Even that wouldn't work. We haven't stopped rape, or murder, or drugs. And we've had a "war on drugs" for decades.

Terrorism is a mindset and a philosophy, and one that has been around since the dawn of civilization. It's going to be part of the world as long as fear and hatred and bigotry exist.

Answer 4

you're close to the truth. terrorism is a tactic not a country or army. traditional military war will never end terrorism but our president dosen't understand these basic facts!

Answer 5

The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

You either stand up to these evil monsters or perish under them. Your choice.

Answer 6

no