The Germans used Chlorine in WWI in a similar manner to clear the trenches.
2007-03-17 07:45:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes
it consider to part of NBC's
Nuclear
Biological
Chemical all three are used as weapons of mass destruction.
2007-03-17 07:48:47 · answer #1 · answered by bleacherbrat34 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
frequently a weapon which will kill hundreds or perhaps hundreds. So issues like nuclear warheads and poisonous brokers like nerve gasoline, poison gases and so on. those weapons could be further by plane or missiles and don't could unavoidably be a right away hit to reason deaths. in fact a weapon designed to reason huge deaths or harm with one launch and in all probability durable outcomes. known bombs and such might reason hundreds of deaths however the area of effect is often fairly small the place as WMD in many situations might cover a plenty larger area. So a classic bomb ought to cover various undred ft a WMD might cover various miles (or perhaps an entire city).
2016-10-02 07:06:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
From my understanding, a chlorine bomb does as much damage as a hand grenade. So my guess would be no.
So sorry, but this is not a point scored for the argument that Iraq had WMD.
2007-03-17 08:05:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only in the broadest sence that the chlorine bomb would be a chemical weapon, and most chemical weapons are classed as WMDs.
But by that argument, mustard gas would also be a WMD.
And if we go that route, then WMD becomes meaningless as a designation.
2007-03-17 07:49:48 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
That is terrible the Americans are using WMD's like chlorine to hurt Iraqis.
2007-03-17 07:49:36 · answer #5 · answered by Villain 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No it doesn't. Oh wait unless you are a Bush supporter desperately clinging to any shred of hope that your fearless leader didnt lie and manipulate the country into an unnecessary war.
2007-03-17 07:49:01 · answer #6 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
On that small scale no. If that were larger and on the end of a missle, yes.
2007-03-17 07:53:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it is not. It can not kill a mass amount of people. It can kill many, but not a mass amout.
2007-03-17 07:49:38 · answer #8 · answered by Rick J 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure, but after I eat steak my flatulence should be considered extremely dangerous. Guard your nose.
2007-03-17 07:55:59 · answer #9 · answered by marijuwannahman 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, it's a chemical bomb, so i suppose so.
2007-03-17 07:48:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋