Well let me say 1st off that I am a Ghost Rider fan. As far as the movie goes, the special effects were amazing, everything I was hoping for. On the SFX end I give it a 5/5.
However, on the script/storyline side I was majorly disappointed. The script seemed like it had been written by an 80s action movie writer. The only comicbook heroes that are allowed to have a cheesy one-liner after taking out an enemy are Spider-Man, Deadpool, and The Human Torch. There may be a few others on the list as well, but Ghost Rider is most certainly not one of them. When is Hollywood going to learn to hire comic book writers to write scripts for comic book movies. It will drasticlly improve the quality of the movies. So on the script end I give it a 2/5.
On the acting end I never really like the casting choice of Nick Cage for this role, he looks too old and he doesn't have the right look for Ghost Rider. And what the hell was with that weird pointing thing he kept doing, where he would point at someone with his hand open, it wsa wierd. For the acting end I give it a 3/5.
2007-03-17 09:14:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by thejoo44 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw and liked Ghost Rider. It was worth at least a '4' for a movie based on a comic book character. The critics sucked as usual. The more they diss a movie the better it is on average. Where do they find these politically correct clowns to review all the films these days?
Sam Elliott and Peter Fonda and the rest of the supporting cast were excellent. Nick Cage did a good job though I thot his script was a little weak in spots.
2007-03-17 21:54:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've seen it. Could have been better and a bit too long in the intro of characters. I was a bit bored in some scenes. The graphics is okay but story wise, nothing much.
Watch it if you have nothing else to watch.
I don't care much about what the critics said,I prefer to judge it on my own. I wasn't blown away by the trailer or anything but my son wanted to see it so we did. We were a bit let down by the movie. I think it's a 2.
2007-03-17 14:31:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by etang 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked the movie Ghost Rider. I thought it was going to be a little dumb, but I though wrong. It had action, it was funny, and it made me want to keep on watching. If you count my friends as critics, they were right. It was a good movie. I would give a a 41/2 out of 5!: )
2007-03-17 18:53:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by me 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good film. About average for the second-tier Marvel Comics adaptations. Heavy on jaw-dropping visual effects, mediocre story. On a scale of 1 to 5, I'd give it 3.5 -- a little better than an average film, but certainly not Spider-Man 2.
2007-03-17 18:54:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Reaper2K 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah. I read all the critics' reviews, so I wasn't expecting that much. But, I was blown away. It has some of the best visuals this year (next to 300, of course) and I highly reccomend you watch it. I'd give it a 4.5.
2007-03-17 14:14:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it was ok but 300 was better 1 being the best and 5 being the worst i give it a 3
2007-03-17 15:36:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by ebelmontinc 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I liked it alot. 300 was better. But it was better than I expected. I could watch it many times and not get tired of it I give it a 4. But I would definitely suggest going to see it.
2007-03-17 14:16:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sarah F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I loved it I would recommend it to everyone if everyone asked this question. I would give in a 5. No its not what I expected it to be because people told me that it was really stupid hope this answers your question
2007-03-17 16:46:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥sammi♥ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO i did not see it
2007-03-17 14:16:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by DeJay 3
·
0⤊
1⤋