English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-17 06:55:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

And disadvantages please

2007-03-17 06:59:35 · update #1

3 answers

The court can enforce the decision.

I'm assuming you mean as an alternative to mediation or arbitration or just a negotiated settlement.

2007-03-17 06:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 0 0

As neither Beth Din or Sharia courts are above the British regulation, and both are voluntary, I even do not have any problem with their existence. both, i'd do not have any own problem in the journey that they were outlawed the following day, yet that could want to require a huge overhaul of the determination of civil disputes, and may require a huge volume of money pumped into the criminal equipment to handle the actual undeniable actuality that civil circumstances may now ought to bypass to courtroom. can we truly want to positioned more beneficial money into attorneys wallet??

2016-12-02 03:33:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It depends entirely on what you mean by "dispute."

If it's a good contract that was prepared by competent attorneys, then going to court should just be about enforcement of some part of that contract, rather than any major dispute.

2007-03-17 07:03:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers