English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

no they should not be forbidden, otherwise there will be more people like you who cannot spell 'forbbiten' and 'snak' properly

:p

2007-03-17 09:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

dont listen to those people i belive in spanking a child in fact some times thay need it o did i mention i am only 18 so i still need it some times only no one is big enough any more but when i have kids i will diciplin them as i see fit and if the government dosent like it then thay can stay out of my home!
and yes i did need it or i would of burnd down some thing by now and i respect my father for doing it

2007-03-17 06:59:40 · answer #2 · answered by tom E 2 · 0 0

No. Freedom of religion skill ALL faith in spite of what Arthwit Rail thinks. I quite have a extra effectual question: could Christians be suggested on expenses of youngster Endangerment for coaching them from a e book that continuously contradicts itself? Rev. Dr. Donald Betz D.D.

2016-10-02 07:00:48 · answer #3 · answered by gilboy 4 · 0 0

Yes, government should forbid parents to use their children as snacks. That's what popcorn is for. I'm from Hawaii.

2007-03-17 05:53:06 · answer #4 · answered by LA Law 4 · 0 0

no, it would be over stepping their power.
if people want to be bad parents its their choice

2007-03-17 06:50:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

what are you--a friggin cannibal? i live in police state.

2007-03-17 05:56:04 · answer #6 · answered by ROBERTSJOHNSON 2 · 0 0

my kids are not doritos.... they are not snacks....and i am in california...and no one i know snacks on their kiddies either.

2007-03-17 08:47:06 · answer #7 · answered by kclark9792 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers